Kenneth Lim Tao Chung

Kenneth Lim Tao Chung is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 7.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 6 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated expertise across 73 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	8 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sub-Lease Agreement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auditing Standards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undervalue Transaction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bank Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Escrow Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantification of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Advisory	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Fees Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Effluxion of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Registration of Charges	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kenneth Lim Tao Chung has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	13 cases	93% of cases	Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation(Jul 2024) Attorney-General v. Shahira Banu: Legal Profession - Duty of Candour in Admission to the Bar(May 2024) Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal in Trust Dispute(Nov 2023)
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	7% of cases	PlanAssure PAC v Gaelic Inns: Auditor Negligence & Duty to Detect Fraud(Aug 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kenneth Lim Tao Chung's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 6 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	63.5 parties avg	3.5	43%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	7%
Partial	65.0 parties avg	5.0	43%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2017	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2018	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2023	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	24.5 parties avg	4.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kenneth Lim Tao Chung's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(43%)	43%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Partial	6(43%)	43%
Won	1(7%)	7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,193,843.43	219,384.3410 cases	10
USD	1,485,460,000.00	742,730,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation 04 Jul 2024 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Appellant)Partial	04 Jul 2024	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, with adjustments to the quantification of compensation. The original award was US$742.73m. The final amount will be adjusted based on the court's findings. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the underlying transactions were denominated in US dollars.
2	Attorney-General v. Shahira Banu: Legal Profession - Duty of Candour in Admission to the Bar 01 May 2024 Law Society of Singapore (Other)Neutral	01 May 2024	Law Society of Singapore (Other): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore was invited to address the court on the issue of the duty of candour owed by an A&S and by applicants for admission.
3	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal in Trust Dispute 01 Nov 2023 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant, Applicant)Partial	01 Nov 2023	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant, Applicant): Stay of execution granted on conditionStay of execution granted on the condition that the defendant pays into Court the full amount of the judgment sums plus post-judgment interest.
4	Ivanishvili v Credit Suisse: Breach of Trust, Quantification of Losses & Costs 18 Sep 2023 Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant)Lost	18 Sep 2023	Credit Suisse Trust Limited (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe defendant breached its duty to the plaintiffs to safeguard the Trust assets as at 30 March 2008 and is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for their loss. The defendant shall pay to a Trust Fund, the trustee of such fund being identified by the plaintiffs to be the 2nd plaintiff, the sum of US$742.73m, being the plaintiffs’ losses calculated in accordance with Model 1B from 30 March 2008 to 26 May 2023 and taking into account the Settlement dated 1 December 2022.
5	Parakou Investment v Parakou Shipping: Directors' Duties & Avoidance of Transactions 16 Jan 2018 PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	16 Jan 2018	PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed in part and allowed in part. Account of profits is available against a fiduciary who procures an unlawful benefit for a corporate vehicle in which he has a substantial interest. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	nTan Corporate Advisory v TT International: Assessment of Professional Fees in Scheme of Arrangement 21 Aug 2017 nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	21 Aug 2017	nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentJudgment for the Plaintiff; the Defendant has to pay the Plaintiff an additional $1,276,735.40 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Costs Allocation After Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims 24 Apr 2017 PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Plaintiff)Partial	24 Apr 2017	PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Plaintiff): Partial SuccessThe plaintiff was awarded party and party costs of $600,000, with the defendants liable for varying percentages. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Parakou Shipping v Liu Cheng Chan: Amendment of Pleadings and Fiduciary Duty 30 Mar 2016 PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Mar 2016	PARAKOU SHIPPING PTE LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (Plaintiff): Application for leave to amend the statement of claim was disallowedPlaintiff's application for leave to amend the statement of claim by adding Paragraphs 42A and 42C was disallowed.
9	Y.E.S. F&B v Soup Restaurant: Contract Interpretation & Sub-Lease Agreement Dispute 01 Oct 2015 SOUP RESTAURANT SINGAPORE PTE LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SOUP RESTAURANT (CAUSEWAY POINT) PTE LTD) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	01 Oct 2015	SOUP RESTAURANT SINGAPORE PTE LTD (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SOUP RESTAURANT (CAUSEWAY POINT) PTE LTD) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedSoup's claim for damages for wrongful possession of the Sub-Leased Premises was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Soup Restaurant v Y.E.S. F&B: Sub-Lease Termination Dispute 23 Nov 2014 SOUP RESTAURANT SINGAPORE PTE LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SOUP RESTAURANT (CAUSEWAY POINT) PTE LTD) (Plaintiff)Won	23 Nov 2014	SOUP RESTAURANT SINGAPORE PTE LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SOUP RESTAURANT (CAUSEWAY POINT) PTE LTD) (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiff's claim was allowed with costs to be agreed or taxed. Damages will be assessed at a separate forum. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Media Development Authority v Sculptor Finance: Extension of Time for Charge Registration 06 Nov 2013 Media Development Authority of Singapore (Appellant)Lost	06 Nov 2013	Media Development Authority of Singapore (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the decision to grant an extension of time to register the charges was dismissed.
12	Sculptor Finance v Media Development Authority: Extension of Time to Register Charges under Companies Act 23 Jan 2013 Media Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent)Lost	23 Jan 2013	Media Development Authority of Singapore (Respondent): Application opposedThe Media Development Authority of Singapore opposed the application, but the application was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Anti-Corrosion Pte Ltd v Berger Paints: Defective Paint, Express Warranty & Causation in Construction Dispute 01 Nov 2011 Berger Paints Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	01 Nov 2011	Berger Paints Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Cross-Appeal DismissedCross-appeal dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
14	PlanAssure PAC v Gaelic Inns: Auditor Negligence & Duty to Detect Fraud 29 Aug 2007 PlanAssure PAC (formerly known as Patrick Lee PAC) (Appellant)Partial	29 Aug 2007	PlanAssure PAC (formerly known as Patrick Lee PAC) (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part. Damages reduced due to contributory negligence. Appellant to pay respondent $317,108.03 with interest of 3% per annum from 22 July 2005. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.