Kellyn Lee Miao Qian

Kellyn Lee Miao Qian is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and jurisdiction. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Kellyn Lee Miao Qian has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	CMJ v CML: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice(Dec 2021) Bunge SA v Shrikant Bhasi: Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens & Contractual Interpretation(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kellyn Lee Miao Qian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kellyn Lee Miao Qian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CMJ v CML: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Alleged Breach of Natural Justice 29 Dec 2021 CMM (Defendant)Won	29 Dec 2021	CMM (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantOriginating Summons dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Bunge SA v Shrikant Bhasi: Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens & Contractual Interpretation 29 Sep 2020 State Bank of India (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	29 Sep 2020	State Bank of India (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; claims to be heard in Singapore (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).