K Sivaratnam

K Sivaratnam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

K Sivaratnam has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal procedure and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	K Sivaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Sivaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	K Sivaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	K Sivaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Sivaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	K Sivaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	K Sivaratnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Auxiliary Police Regulations	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	K Sivaratnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

K Sivaratnam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
S Ratnam & Associates	2 cases	100% of cases	Wong Tiew Yong v PP: Auxiliary Police Officers' Conduct & Sentencing Appeal(Aug 2003) Public Prosecutor v. Thiruselvan: Abetment of Cannabis Trafficking(Oct 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of K Sivaratnam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of K Sivaratnam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	500.00	500.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wong Tiew Yong v PP: Auxiliary Police Officers' Conduct & Sentencing Appeal 27 Aug 2003 Karuppiah Subramaniam (Appellant)Partial	27 Aug 2003	Karuppiah Subramaniam (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowedAppeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed. Fine of $500 imposed on each charge (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Public Prosecutor v. Thiruselvan: Abetment of Cannabis Trafficking 03 Oct 2000 Thiruselvan s/o Nagaratnam (Defendant)Lost	03 Oct 2000	Thiruselvan s/o Nagaratnam (Defendant): Accused found guiltyThe accused was found guilty of abetting Katheraven in trafficking cannabis.