Justin Blaze George

Justin Blaze George is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and passing off. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Justin Blaze George has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trademarks.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	20% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Justin Blaze George has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Justin Blaze George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Justin Blaze George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Justin Blaze George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Justin Blaze George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Justin Blaze George has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendments	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Justin Blaze George has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Justin Blaze George has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Justin Blaze George has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ravindran Associates	3 cases	100% of cases	Sarika v Ferrero: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off Dispute(Oct 2012) Dien Ghin v Khek Tai Ting: Patent Revocation for Lack of Novelty & Inventive Step(Feb 2011) PT Swakarya Indah Busana v Dhan International Exim Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Invalidity & Bad Faith Registration(Dec 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Justin Blaze George's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Justin Blaze George's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sarika v Ferrero: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off Dispute 15 Oct 2012 Ferrero SpA (Respondent)Won	15 Oct 2012	Ferrero SpA (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Ferrero SpA won the appeal. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
2	Dien Ghin v Khek Tai Ting: Patent Revocation for Lack of Novelty & Inventive Step 20 Feb 2011 Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Feb 2011	Dien Ghin Electronic (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSingapore Patent No 89534 be revoked, and that the defendant’s counterclaim against the plaintiff for infringement of the same patent be dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	PT Swakarya Indah Busana v Dhan International Exim Pte Ltd: Trade Mark Invalidity & Bad Faith Registration 13 Dec 2009 PT Swakarya Indah Busana (Plaintiff)Won	13 Dec 2009	PT Swakarya Indah Busana (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared the defendant’s mark under Trade Mark registration number T0206327F in Class 25 invalid. Costs awarded to the plaintiff on a standard basis to be taxed unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.