Joshua Tan Ming En

Joshua Tan Ming En is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fair Hearing Rule	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Societies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rule against bias	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Ultra vires	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Equitable Execution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appointment of Receivers	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joshua Tan Ming En has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joshua Tan Ming En has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Invictus Law Corporation	3 cases	75% of cases	Li See Kit Lawrence v Debate Association (Singapore): Breach of Contract, Negligence, Natural Justice, and Ultra Vires Action(May 2023) La Dolce Vita v Zhang Lan: Equitable Execution, Receivership & Beneficial Ownership(Nov 2022) La Dolce Vita v Zhang Lan: Discovery of Banker's Books & Banking Secrecy(Apr 2022)
LVM Law Chambers	1 cases	25% of cases	Lim Choo Eng v Koh Siew Eng: Misrepresentation Act, Restitution, and Unjust Enrichment in Land Investment Dispute(Aug 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joshua Tan Ming En's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	25.8 parties avg	5.8
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joshua Tan Ming En's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Li See Kit Lawrence v Debate Association (Singapore): Breach of Contract, Negligence, Natural Justice, and Ultra Vires Action 22 May 2023 Debate Association (Singapore) (Defendant)Partial	22 May 2023	Debate Association (Singapore) (Defendant): Claim Partially UpheldDeclarations granted that the Ban and Notice to Partners were unlawful. No monetary damages awarded.
2	La Dolce Vita v Zhang Lan: Equitable Execution, Receivership & Beneficial Ownership 01 Nov 2022 Qiao Jiang Lan Development Limited (Defendant)Lost	01 Nov 2022	Qiao Jiang Lan Development Limited (Defendant): Receivers appointed over the Bank AccountsReceivers appointed over the Bank Accounts.
3	La Dolce Vita v Zhang Lan: Discovery of Banker's Books & Banking Secrecy 20 Apr 2022 Zhang Lan (Defendant)Neutral	20 Apr 2022	Zhang Lan (Defendant): UnknownThe outcome for this party is not explicitly stated in this extract.
4	Lim Choo Eng v Koh Siew Eng: Misrepresentation Act, Restitution, and Unjust Enrichment in Land Investment Dispute 22 Aug 2019 Koh Siew Eng (Defendant)Won	22 Aug 2019	Koh Siew Eng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the defendant.