John Tan

John Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

John Tan has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in maintenance and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Maintenance	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Children's Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	John Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

John Tan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Pereira & Tan LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Tang Ngai Sheung Peggy v Wong Yeu Yu: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Lump Sum Maintenance in Divorce(Nov 2008)
Leo Fernando LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2019)
Thomas Tham & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Chan Siew Fong v Chan Fook Kee: Division of Matrimonial Home Proceeds(Jan 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of John Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of John Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	396,000.00	198,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Moad Fadzir v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Abetment under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Nov 2019 Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Appellant)Lost	24 Nov 2019	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa (Appellant): Appeal DismissedMoad Fadzir's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
2	Tang Ngai Sheung Peggy v Wong Yeu Yu: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Lump Sum Maintenance in Divorce 25 Nov 2008 Wong Yeu Yu (Respondent)Lost	25 Nov 2008	Wong Yeu Yu (Respondent): Matrimonial home divided equally; Lump sum maintenance awardedH is to give W half share of No 47 Truro Road. H is to pay W lump sum maintenance of $396,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Chan Siew Fong v Chan Fook Kee: Division of Matrimonial Home Proceeds 16 Jan 2002 Chan Fook Kee (Respondent)Lost	16 Jan 2002	Chan Fook Kee (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent's share of the matrimonial asset was reduced to zero (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).