Johan Ismail

Johan Ismail is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 27% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Johan Ismail has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	15 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	13 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	10 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	7 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Theft	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Murder	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deficient Legal Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation Plea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Defence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Criminal Enterprise	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mischief by Fire	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Entrapment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Attempted Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Johan Ismail has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Johan Ismail has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Johan Ismail & Co	8 cases	53% of cases	PP v Ravan: Misuse of Drugs Act Sentencing for Cannabis Trafficking(Apr 2018) PP v Chum Tat Suan: Statutory Relief for Drug Couriers under Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2014) PP v Mohd Jeefrey: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2014)
Independent Practitioner	2 cases	13% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance(Nov 2022) PP v Abdul Salam: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention(Sep 2000)
Johan Ismail and Co	2 cases	13% of cases	PP v Sundarti Supriyanto: Culpable Homicide Sentencing Considerations(Oct 2004) PP v Sundarti Supriyanto: Culpable Homicide & Provocation Defense(Sep 2004)
Johan Ismail & Partners	2 cases	13% of cases	Wan Kamil v PP: Murder Conviction Upheld for Taxi Driver Killing; Common Intention & Duress Examined(Mar 2002) PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver(Nov 2001)
Johan Ismail & Company	1 cases	7% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Ramli bin Ismail: Trafficking of Diamorphine(Nov 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Johan Ismail's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 4 (27%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	132.9 parties avg	2.9	87%
Other	13.0 parties avg	3.0	7%
Withdrawn	14.0 parties avg	4.0	7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2001	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2002	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Johan Ismail's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	13(87%)	87%
Other	1(7%)	7%
Withdrawn	1(7%)	7%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (33.3%)
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance 15 Nov 2022 Haridass s/o Mohan (Defendant)Other	15 Nov 2022	Haridass s/o Mohan (Defendant): Application AllowedAccused allowed to recall Prosecution witnesses and give further evidence.
2	PP v Ravan: Misuse of Drugs Act Sentencing for Cannabis Trafficking 25 Apr 2018 Noor Azmi bin A Rahman (Defendant)Lost	25 Apr 2018	Noor Azmi bin A Rahman (Defendant): Guilty plea entered; sentenced to 25 years of imprisonment and 15 strokes of the caneNoor Azmi was convicted of trafficking by delivering to Ilango three blocks of vegetable matter containing not less than 499.99 grams of cannabis.
3	PP v Chum Tat Suan: Statutory Relief for Drug Couriers under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2014 Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Respondent)Lost	27 Nov 2014	Abdul Kahar bin Othman (Respondent): Finding quashedThe Judge’s findings that Abdul Kahar’s involvement in committing the offences under ss 5(1) and 7 of the MDA respectively fell within the ambit of ss 33B(2)(a) and 33B(3)(a) ought to be quashed.
4	PP v Mohd Jeefrey: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2014 Mohd Jeefrey bin Jamil (Defendant)Lost	27 Nov 2014	Mohd Jeefrey bin Jamil (Defendant): Death SentenceAccused was sentenced to death.
5	Public Prosecutor v Galing Anak Kujat: Murder and Robbery under Penal Code 29 Jul 2010 Jabing Kho (Defendant)Lost	29 Jul 2010	Jabing Kho (Defendant): GuiltyFound guilty of murder and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
6	Public Prosecutor v Pausi bin Jefridin & Roslan bin Bakar: Trafficking Diamorphine & Methamphetamine 21 Apr 2010 Pausi bin Jefridin (Defendant)Lost	21 Apr 2010	Pausi bin Jefridin (Defendant): Guilty as chargedPausi was found guilty as charged.
7	PP v Sundarti Supriyanto: Culpable Homicide Sentencing Considerations 28 Oct 2004 Sundarti Supriyanto (Accused)Lost	28 Oct 2004	Sundarti Supriyanto (Accused): Life ImprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment.
8	PP v Sundarti Supriyanto: Culpable Homicide & Provocation Defense 23 Sep 2004 Sundarti Supriyanto (Accused)Lost	23 Sep 2004	Sundarti Supriyanto (Accused): Convicted of culpable homicideConvicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under section 304(a) Penal Code.
9	Public Prosecutor v Ramli bin Ismail: Trafficking of Diamorphine 05 Nov 2002 Ramli bin Ismail (Defendant)Lost	05 Nov 2002	Ramli bin Ismail (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was convicted as charged and sentenced to suffer death.
10	Amran Bin Eusuff v PP: Drug Trafficking, Entrapment, & Admissibility of Confessions 31 Mar 2002 Rabu Bin Rahmat (Appellant)Lost	31 Mar 2002	Rabu Bin Rahmat (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
11	Wan Kamil v PP: Murder Conviction Upheld for Taxi Driver Killing; Common Intention & Duress Examined 06 Mar 2002 WAN KAMIL BIN MD SHAFIAN (Appellant)Withdrawn	06 Mar 2002	WAN KAMIL BIN MD SHAFIAN (Appellant): Appeal WithdrawnThe first appellant withdrew his appeal.
12	PP v Amran bin Eusuff: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Dec 2001 Rabu Bin Rahmat (Defendant)Lost	25 Dec 2001	Rabu Bin Rahmat (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
13	PP v Wan Kamil: Murder, Common Intention, Armed Robbery of Taxi Driver 27 Nov 2001 IBRAHIM BIN MOHD (Defendant)Lost	27 Nov 2001	IBRAHIM BIN MOHD (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of murder under section 302 read with section 34 of the Penal Code and sentenced accordingly.
14	Suboh bin Ramli v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 15 Nov 2000 Suboh bin Ramli (Appellant)Lost	15 Nov 2000	Suboh bin Ramli (Appellant): Appeal DismissedSuboh's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
15	PP v Abdul Salam: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention 06 Sep 2000 Suboh bin Ramli (Defendant)Lost	06 Sep 2000	Suboh bin Ramli (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted on the amended charge of trafficking alone in the drugs.