Jason Chan

Jason Chan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 32 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and patents. Their track record shows a 45.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 28% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jason Chan has demonstrated expertise across 118 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	12 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	9 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patents	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Acquiescence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of court proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Claim Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Invalidity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Specification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Revocation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administration of Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-joinder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fictitious Purchase Scheme	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credibility of Witness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joinder of Parties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside arbitral awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Attendance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cause of action estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside enforcement order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Validity of settlement agreement containing arbitration clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Brokerage Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Effective Cause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Experiments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discount on minority shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inventive step	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Benchmark Sentences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ademption	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Amendments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hit and Run	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Post-traumatic stress syndrome	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Morbid Jealousy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy to Import Drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat of infringement proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sufficiency of Disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Falsification of Documents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jason Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jason Chan has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	11 cases	34% of cases	Bank of China v BP Singapore: Negligence, Fraud & Letter of Credit Dispute(May 2021) SAR Maritime v PCL Shipping: Brokerage Agreement, Termination, and Commission Dispute(Mar 2020) Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA(Mar 2020)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	6 cases	19% of cases	G Krishnasamy Naidu v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Abnormality of Mind in Murder Case(Sep 2006) Koh Zhan Quan Tony v Public Prosecutor: Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal in Criminal Appeals(Apr 2006) Public Prosecutor v Vijayakumar: Murder, Private Defence & Penal Code Exceptions(Nov 2005)
Amica Law LLC	6 cases	19% of cases	IIa Technologies v Element Six: Patent Invalidity & Infringement in CVD Diamond Production(Feb 2023) Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Discovery of Documents in Patent Litigation(Aug 2018) Clearlab SG Pte Ltd v Ma Zhi: Appeal on Costs Order Requires Leave(May 2016)
Allen & Gledhill	3 cases	9% of cases	FE Global Electronics v Trek Technology: Patent Infringement, Purposive Claim Construction & Validity(Dec 2005) Genelabs v Institut Pasteur: HIV-2 Patent Validity & Infringement(Nov 2000) Institut Pasteur v Genelabs: HIV-2 Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute(Mar 2000)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	3 cases	9% of cases	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi v PP: Conspiracy & Importation of Controlled Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2006) PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death(Jul 2005) Public Prosecutor v Teo Chee Seng: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Infant Death(Feb 2005)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	6% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Lee Meng Soon: Drink Driving & Failure to Render Assistance Sentencing(Aug 2007) PP v Lim Ah Seng: Culpable Homicide, Sentencing, Spousal Abuse & Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(Mar 2007)
Allen and Gledhill	1 cases	3% of cases	Trek Technology v FE Global: Patent Infringement, Validity & Misrepresentation(May 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jason Chan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 9 (28%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	113.7 parties avg	3.7	34%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	63.6 parties avg	3.6	19%
Won	153.4 parties avg	3.4	47%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	73.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2016	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2019	33.7 parties avg	3.7
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jason Chan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	11(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	6(18%)	18%
Won	15(45%)	45%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	917,000.00	83,363.6411 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	7 115	Lost: 1 cases (14.3%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 5 cases (71.4%)
2006	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 32 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	IIa Technologies v Element Six: Patent Invalidity & Infringement in CVD Diamond Production 16 Feb 2023 Element Six Technologies Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	16 Feb 2023	Element Six Technologies Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Patent RevokedThe patent SG 872 was revoked due to insufficiency.
2	Bank of China v BP Singapore: Negligence, Fraud & Letter of Credit Dispute 30 May 2021 Bank of China Ltd, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	30 May 2021	Bank of China Ltd, Singapore Branch (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Bank's appeal was allowed, reinstating its claims against BP Singapore.
3	SAR Maritime v PCL Shipping: Brokerage Agreement, Termination, and Commission Dispute 24 Mar 2020 PCL (Shipping) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	24 Mar 2020	PCL (Shipping) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; PCL awarded costs of $40,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA 23 Mar 2020 Steep Rise Limited (Appellant)Lost	23 Mar 2020	Steep Rise Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Steep Rise Limited ordered to pay costs of $40,000 to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Rex International v Gulf Hibiscus: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration 21 Oct 2019 Gulf Hibiscus Limited (Respondent)Won	21 Oct 2019	Gulf Hibiscus Limited (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; Appellants to pay the Respondent costs of $27,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Thio Syn Pyn v Thio Syn Kym Wendy: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 26 Mar 2019 Thio Syn Wee (Appellant)Lost	26 Mar 2019	Thio Syn Wee (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $28,000 (all-in) were to be paid by the Appellant to the Respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Gulf Hibiscus v Rex International: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration 23 Jan 2019 Gulf Hibiscus Limited (Plaintiff)Won	23 Jan 2019	Gulf Hibiscus Limited (Plaintiff): Application GrantedPlaintiff's application to lift the stay in Suit No 412 of 2016 was granted.
8	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Discovery of Documents in Patent Litigation 26 Aug 2018 Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	26 Aug 2018	Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Specific discovery granted in partRequest 2 (limited) and Request 4(i) granted. Request 4(ii) disallowed, but explanation on affidavit ordered. Requests 3, 5, and 6 disallowed.
9	Thio Syn Kym Wendy v Thio Syn Pyn: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation in Malaysia Dairy Industries 12 Mar 2018 Thio Syn Wee (Defendant)Lost	12 Mar 2018	Thio Syn Wee (Defendant): Minority discount not appliedCourt ordered that no minority discount be applied to the sale of the plaintiff's shares in Malaysia Dairy Industries Pte Ltd. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Gulf Hibiscus Ltd v Rex International Holding Ltd: Stay of Court Proceedings & Arbitration Scope 23 Aug 2017 Gulf Hibiscus Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	23 Aug 2017	Gulf Hibiscus Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal against the stay of court proceedings was dismissed.
11	Clearlab SG Pte Ltd v Ma Zhi: Appeal on Costs Order Requires Leave 19 May 2016 LI YUEXIN (Respondent)Won	19 May 2016	LI YUEXIN (Respondent): Costs Order upheldJudge’s Costs Order in favour of the respondents in the sum of $270,000 excluding disbursements was upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	HSBC Trustee v Fong: Estate Administration, Executor Discharge & Mortgage Authorization 03 Mar 2016 Fong Wei Heng (Defendant)Partial	03 Mar 2016	Fong Wei Heng (Defendant): Partial LossThe fourth and fifth defendants were ordered to pay costs to the Plaintiff and the Fong Sisters.
13	Clearlab v Ting Chong Chai: Costs for Breach of Confidence Claim 13 Oct 2015 Jason Chan (Defendant)Won	13 Oct 2015	Jason Chan (Defendant): Costs awardedJoint costs awarded to the seventh and eighth defendants in the sum of $270,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Veeramani Manikam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Importation Conviction Allowed 02 Aug 2015 Veeramani Manikam (Appellant)Won	02 Aug 2015	Veeramani Manikam (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and conviction set aside.
15	AstraZeneca v Sanofi-Aventis: Patent Infringement, Medicines Act & Pharmaceutical Compositions 14 Mar 2013 Sanofi-Aventis Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	14 Mar 2013	Sanofi-Aventis Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application allowed in partSanofi-Aventis's application for further particulars was partially granted.
16	Hong Alvin v Chia Quee Khee: Striking Out Claim, Wills Act, Trust, Locus Standi 17 Nov 2011 Chia Quee Khee (Respondent)Lost	17 Nov 2011	Chia Quee Khee (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe Respondent’s Statement of Claim as against the Appellant in Suit 423 of 2010 is struck out. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Public Prosecutor v Lee Meng Soon: Drink Driving & Failure to Render Assistance Sentencing 13 Aug 2007 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Partial	13 Aug 2007	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with the sentence for drink driving increased.
18	PP v Lim Ah Seng: Culpable Homicide, Sentencing, Spousal Abuse & Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 25 Mar 2007 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	25 Mar 2007	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence imposedThe court sentenced the accused to two years and six months’ imprisonment backdated to date of arrest.
19	Trek Technology v Ritronics Components: Interrogatories in Assessment of Damages 11 Dec 2006 Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	11 Dec 2006	Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s order was dismissed.
20	G Krishnasamy Naidu v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Abnormality of Mind in Murder Case 20 Sep 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	20 Sep 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the original conviction was overturned.
21	Koh Zhan Quan Tony v Public Prosecutor: Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal in Criminal Appeals 24 Apr 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Apr 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal upheldThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal on the murder charge was upheld.
22	Iwuchukwu Amara Tochi v PP: Conspiracy & Importation of Controlled Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act 15 Mar 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Mar 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeals by both appellants were dismissed.
23	FE Global Electronics v Trek Technology: Patent Infringement, Purposive Claim Construction & Validity 29 Dec 2005 Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	29 Dec 2005	Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff, with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Public Prosecutor v Vijayakumar: Murder, Private Defence & Penal Code Exceptions 29 Nov 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Nov 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted of murder.
25	PP v Juminem: Diminished Responsibility & Provocation in Maid's Murder Case 04 Sep 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	04 Sep 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe Prosecution's charge of murder was not proven, but the accused were convicted of culpable homicide.
26	PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death 14 Jul 2005 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	14 Jul 2005	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the respondents were convicted of murder.
27	Public Prosecutor v Teo Chee Seng: Culpable Homicide Sentencing Appeal for Infant's Death by Medicated Oil 11 May 2005 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	11 May 2005	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal allowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed.
28	Trek Technology v FE Global: Patent Infringement, Validity & Misrepresentation 11 May 2005 M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	11 May 2005	M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claims dismissedClaims against M-Systems dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29	Public Prosecutor v Teo Chee Seng: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Infant Death 27 Feb 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 Feb 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused sentenced to four years’ imprisonment.
30	Public Prosecutor v Lim Boon Seng: Culpable Homicide and Mitigation Factors in Debt-Related Stabbing 27 May 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	27 May 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe accused was sentenced to imprisonment of three years and six months.
31	Genelabs v Institut Pasteur: HIV-2 Patent Validity & Infringement 01 Nov 2000 Genelabs Diagnostics Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	01 Nov 2000	Genelabs Diagnostics Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision of Tay Yong Kwang JC was dismissed with costs and with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Institut Pasteur v Genelabs: HIV-2 Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute 30 Mar 2000 Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	30 Mar 2000	Nagase Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; no damages or account of profits would be ordered against the Second Defendant by virtue of Section 69(1). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.