Jared Kok

Jared Kok is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jared Kok has demonstrated expertise across 51 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commodities Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jared Kok has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jared Kok has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	6 cases	75% of cases	Prudential Assurance v Peter Tan: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Restraint of Trade in Mass Agent Departure(May 2021) Wei Fengpin v Low Tuck Loong Raymond: Oppression of Minority Shareholder Claim(Apr 2021) SK Lateral v Lateral Solutions: Security for Costs in International Commercial Dispute(Apr 2020)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	25% of cases	BASF Intertrade AG v H&C S Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration(Aug 2017) Kraze Entertainment v Marina Bay Sands: Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Furnish Security for Costs(Feb 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jared Kok's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 13.0
Complex Cases: 3 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	415.8 parties avg	15.8	50%
Partial	28.1 parties avg	8.1	25%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	218.0 parties avg	18.0
2019	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	23.7 parties avg	3.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jared Kok's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(50%)	50%
Partial	2(25%)	25%
Won	2(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Prudential Assurance v Peter Tan: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty & Restraint of Trade in Mass Agent Departure 04 May 2021 Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Partial	04 May 2021	Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff in part; damages to be assessed.
2	Wei Fengpin v Low Tuck Loong Raymond: Oppression of Minority Shareholder Claim 14 Apr 2021 Sim Eng Chuan (Defendant)Lost	14 Apr 2021	Sim Eng Chuan (Defendant): Claim Partially Upheld AgainstOrdered to pay the Company US$800,000 and the equivalent of the Big Bonuses.
3	SK Lateral v Lateral Solutions: Security for Costs in International Commercial Dispute 16 Apr 2020 Lateral Solutions Pte Ltd (Defendant, Counterclaimant)Lost	16 Apr 2020	Lateral Solutions Pte Ltd (Defendant, Counterclaimant): Application dismissedLateral's application for security of costs was dismissed, and Lateral is liable for the costs of the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Liew Kit Fah v Koh Keng Chew: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Buyout 26 Nov 2019 Poh Teck Chuan (Appellant)Partial	26 Nov 2019	Poh Teck Chuan (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe independent valuer is to re-value the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group taking into account the discount for lack of control. The independent valuer is free to decide whether the discount for lack of marketability should apply in re-valuing the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group. In the event the independent valuer’s re-valuation of the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group returns a value less than that in its 3 August 2018 report, the respondents are to refund the appellants the difference between the sum that they were bought out with and the re-valued price of their shares in the Samwoh Group.
5	Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Minority Shareholder Rights, Oppression, and Valuation of Shares 27 Nov 2018 Sam Land Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Nov 2018	Sam Land Pte Ltd (Defendant): Discounts for lack of control and free transferability not appliedCourt directed that discounts for lack of control and lack of free transferability were not to be applied to the valuation of the plaintiffs’ shares.
6	Shanghai Turbo v Liu Ming: Setting Aside Service Order & Interim Injunctions 29 Jul 2018 Liu Ming (Defendant)Won	29 Jul 2018	Liu Ming (Defendant): Application to set aside service order grantedApplication to set aside service order and interim injunctions allowed. Costs of $20,000 with reasonable disbursements to be paid by Shanghai Turbo to Mr Liu. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	BASF Intertrade AG v H&C S Holdings: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 07 Aug 2017 H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 Aug 2017	H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application granted.Application for stay of court proceedings in favour of arbitration granted. The court found an arbitration agreement applied to the dispute.
8	Kraze Entertainment v Marina Bay Sands: Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Furnish Security for Costs 17 Feb 2013 Kraze Entertainment (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	17 Feb 2013	Kraze Entertainment (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the order dismissing the application for an extension of time to furnish security for costs was dismissed.