James Ow Yong

James Ow Yong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and offences.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

James Ow Yong has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personating a public servant	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Appeals	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal motions	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James Ow Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

James Ow Yong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kalco Law LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	PP v Muhammad Firman: Rape, Sexual Assault, Impersonating Public Servant(Oct 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of James Ow Yong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of James Ow Yong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Muhammad Firman: Rape, Sexual Assault, Impersonating Public Servant 27 Oct 2016 Muhammad Firman bin Jumali Chew (Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2016	Muhammad Firman bin Jumali Chew (Defendant): Guilty verdict and sentence imposedThe accused was found guilty on all three charges and sentenced to 12 years and 6 months of imprisonment and 11 strokes of the cane.