Isabel Chew Maggie

Isabel Chew Maggie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Isabel Chew Maggie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Isabel Chew Maggie has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Fernandez v Woi: Breach of Agency & Fiduciary Duties in Nominee Director Arrangement(May 2021)
Virginia Quek Lalita & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	UMU v UMT: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Damages for Pain and Suffering, and Child Maintenance(Nov 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Isabel Chew Maggie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Isabel Chew Maggie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	1,028,455.00	1,028,455.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Fernandez v Woi: Breach of Agency & Fiduciary Duties in Nominee Director Arrangement 16 May 2021 Daniel Fernandez (Plaintiff)Won	16 May 2021	Daniel Fernandez (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the first defendant is ordered to return the amount of US$1,028,455.00 to the plaintiff, with interest at the rate of 5.33% from the date of the writ to the date of judgment. I order this sum to be paid to the plaintiff rather than the second defendant’s bank account because the custodial fiduciary breach did not arise out of the first defendant’s position as director of the second defendant, but out of her role as agent to the plaintiff, so the funds should be compensated to him. Assumed USD, as the judgment refers to USD amounts.
2	UMU v UMT: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Damages for Pain and Suffering, and Child Maintenance 11 Nov 2018 UMT (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	11 Nov 2018	UMT (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part on all other issues. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.