Huang Xinli Daniel

Huang Xinli Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and restructuring and dissolution. Their track record shows a 83.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 83% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in insolvency law and restructuring and dissolution.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Insolvency Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Validity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Proof of Debt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duties of interim judicial manager	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Huang Xinli Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Huang Xinli Daniel has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Providence Law Asia LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	Re Smith, Tom KC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in UTSS Appeal(Jan 2025) Lim Oon Kuin v Official Assignee: Appointment of Private Trustees in Bankruptcy Dispute(Dec 2024) Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification(Oct 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Huang Xinli Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.9
Complex Cases: 5 (83%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	110.0 parties avg	10.0	17%
Won	511.1 parties avg	11.1	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	213.6 parties avg	13.6
2024	310.6 parties avg	10.6
2025	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Huang Xinli Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Won	5(83%)	83%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Smith, Tom KC: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel in UTSS Appeal 15 Jan 2025 Mr Chan Kheng Tek (Respondent)Won	15 Jan 2025	Mr Chan Kheng Tek (Respondent): Successful ObjectionObjection to the admission application was successful. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lim Oon Kuin v Official Assignee: Appointment of Private Trustees in Bankruptcy Dispute 29 Dec 2024 Hin Leong Trading (Pte.) Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Non-party)Neutral	29 Dec 2024	Hin Leong Trading (Pte.) Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Non-party): NeutralHin Leong Trading (Pte.) Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) was a non-party in the proceedings.
3	Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification 14 Oct 2024 Hin Leong Trading (Pte.) Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Applicant)Won	14 Oct 2024	Hin Leong Trading (Pte.) Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Applicant): Application GrantedThe application to sanction the scheme of arrangement was granted.
4	Farooq Ahmad Mann v Golden Mountain Textile: Extension of Judicial Management Order under IRDA 22 Feb 2024 Farooq Ahmad Mann (Applicant)Won	22 Feb 2024	Farooq Ahmad Mann (Applicant): Application grantedThe applicant's application for an extension of the judicial management order and the timeline to put forward his statement of proposals was granted.
5	PT Bank Negara Indonesia v Farooq Ahmad Mann: Judicial Management, Proof of Debt & Extension of Time 05 Sep 2023 Farooq Ahmad Mann (in his capacity as judicial manager) (Respondent, Applicant)Won	05 Sep 2023	Farooq Ahmad Mann (in his capacity as judicial manager) (Respondent, Applicant): Application AllowedOriginating Application No 448 allowed; extension of time granted.
6	Yap Sze Kam v Yang Kee Logistics: Judicial Management vs. Bondholder Rights 23 Feb 2023 Cosimo Borrelli (Other)Won	23 Feb 2023	Cosimo Borrelli (Other): Application DismissedOpposed the JM Applications.