Gurdip Singh

Gurdip Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and evidence. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gurdip Singh has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Theft	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hire Purchase	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Money Exchange	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gurdip Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gurdip Singh has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gurdip & Gill	3 cases	50% of cases	Tan Kim Huat Jerry v Public Prosecutor: Forgery, Car Sales Dispute, and Sentence Appeal(May 2014) Nagase Singapore v Ching Kai Huat: Conspiracy & Overcharging Dispute(Oct 2007) PP v Kamal Bin Kupli: Murder, Common Intention, and Penal Code Interpretation(Jun 2007)
George Sandosham Gurdip & Partners	2 cases	33% of cases	Syed Abdul Mutalip v PP: Retracted Confessions, Common Intention, and Drug Trafficking(May 2002) Public Prosecutor v Syed Abdul Mutalip & Roetikno: Drug Trafficking Case(Feb 2002)
Harpal Mahtani Partnership	1 cases	17% of cases	Luyono Lam v PP: Cash Movement Offences & Anti-Money Laundering Act(May 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gurdip Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.4 parties avg	3.4	83%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gurdip Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	125,238.13	125,238.131 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Kim Huat Jerry v Public Prosecutor: Forgery, Car Sales Dispute, and Sentence Appeal 22 May 2014 Tan Kim Huat Jerry (Appellant)Lost	22 May 2014	Tan Kim Huat Jerry (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the four-week imprisonment sentence was dismissed.
2	Luyono Lam v PP: Cash Movement Offences & Anti-Money Laundering Act 23 May 2010 Luyono Lam (Appellant)Won	23 May 2010	Luyono Lam (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed and the imprisonment sentence was substituted with a fine.
3	Nagase Singapore v Ching Kai Huat: Conspiracy & Overcharging Dispute 02 Oct 2007 Mary Ting Chi Fong (Defendant)Lost	02 Oct 2007	Mary Ting Chi Fong (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDamages awarded for negligence. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	PP v Kamal Bin Kupli: Murder, Common Intention, and Penal Code Interpretation 26 Jun 2007 Kamal Bin Kupli (Defendant)Lost	26 Jun 2007	Kamal Bin Kupli (Defendant): ConvictedFound guilty on the charge they faced, convicted them, and imposed the mandatory death sentence on them.
5	Syed Abdul Mutalip v PP: Retracted Confessions, Common Intention, and Drug Trafficking 16 May 2002 Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek (Appellant)Lost	16 May 2002	Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
6	Public Prosecutor v Syed Abdul Mutalip & Roetikno: Drug Trafficking Case 17 Feb 2002 Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek (Defendant)Lost	17 Feb 2002	Syed Abdul Mutalip bin Syed Sidek (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe Defendant lost the case and was found guilty as charged.