Goh Peck San

Goh Peck San is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Goh Peck San has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Condition Precedent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collateral Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Convention	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Property	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Racking Systems	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domestic Helper Abuse	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Purchase Money Resulting Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commission Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Peck San has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Goh Peck San has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
P S Goh & Co	5 cases	71% of cases	Ivy Ng Soh Peng v Solution Aircon: Appeal on Enforceability of Oral Contract for Property Purchase Discount(Apr 2022) Solution Aircon v Ng Soh Peng: Breach of Contract over Racking Systems Purchase Agreement(Sep 2021) Chin Kim Yon v Chin Kheng Hai: Resulting Trust, Advancement & Illegitimate Children(Jan 2016)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	14% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Yeo Gek Hong: Maid Assault Case & Penal Code Interpretation(Mar 2003)
PS Goh & Co	1 cases	14% of cases	CGU International Insurance v Quah Boon Hua: Letter of Indemnity and Signatories' Intent(Sep 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh Peck San's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%
Won	43.3 parties avg	3.3	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh Peck San's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(14%)	14%
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	600,000.00	150,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ivy Ng Soh Peng v Solution Aircon: Appeal on Enforceability of Oral Contract for Property Purchase Discount 21 Apr 2022 Solution Aircon & Engrg Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	21 Apr 2022	Solution Aircon & Engrg Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for SAE for $300,000, representing the sum promised under the agreement, plus costs of $33,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Solution Aircon v Ng Soh Peng: Breach of Contract over Racking Systems Purchase Agreement 27 Sep 2021 Solution Aircon & Engrg Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2021	Solution Aircon & Engrg Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $300,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Chin Kim Yon v Chin Kheng Hai: Resulting Trust, Advancement & Illegitimate Children 05 Jan 2016 Chin Kheng Hai (Defendant)Won	05 Jan 2016	Chin Kheng Hai (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Asia Polyurethane v Tandjung Marketing: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty Dispute 01 Feb 2007 Asia Polyurethane Mfg Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	01 Feb 2007	Asia Polyurethane Mfg Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed due to imprecise pleadings and poorly adduced narrative evidence.
5	Chew Tong Seng v Chew Cheng Quee: Resulting Trust, Advancement, Estoppel & Minority Shareholder Oppression 22 Aug 2006 Chew Cheng Quee (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	22 Aug 2006	Chew Cheng Quee (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedCounterclaim for loans dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Public Prosecutor v. Yeo Gek Hong: Maid Assault Case & Penal Code Interpretation 23 Mar 2003 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	23 Mar 2003	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of the defendant was dismissed.
7	CGU International Insurance v Quah Boon Hua: Letter of Indemnity and Signatories' Intent 28 Sep 2000 Quah Boon Hua (Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2000	Quah Boon Hua (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's claim against the first defendant was dismissed with costs.