Glenn Seah Kim Ming

Glenn Seah Kim Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Identification Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Homicide	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Glenn Seah Kim Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Glenn Seah Kim Ming has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutor	3 cases	60% of cases	J Ravinthiran v PP: Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt with Motor Vehicle under Penal Code s 326(Aug 2004) Roslan Bin Abdul Rani v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal(Jun 2004) Govindaraj Perumalsamy v PP: Identification Parade Irregularities and Sentencing in Robbery with Hurt Case(Feb 2004)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	20% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Thamayanthi: Culpable Homicide, Intention to Cause Injury, and Sufficiency of Evidence(Dec 2001)
Attorney-General's Cambers	1 cases	20% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Aw Kim Lye: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Glenn Seah Kim Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	40%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	33.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Glenn Seah Kim Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	J Ravinthiran v PP: Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt with Motor Vehicle under Penal Code s 326 10 Aug 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Aug 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the appeal; original conviction and sentence upheld.
2	Roslan Bin Abdul Rani v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal 14 Jun 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	14 Jun 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
3	Govindaraj Perumalsamy v PP: Identification Parade Irregularities and Sentencing in Robbery with Hurt Case 03 Feb 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	03 Feb 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissed for three appellants, appeal allowed for one appellantThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld against three appellants, but the appeal of the fourth appellant was allowed.
4	Public Prosecutor v Thamayanthi: Culpable Homicide, Intention to Cause Injury, and Sufficiency of Evidence 13 Dec 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	13 Dec 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe Public Prosecutor proved the offence of causing grievous hurt but failed to prove murder.
5	Public Prosecutor v Aw Kim Lye: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Oct 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 Oct 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe accused was convicted of trafficking diamorphine.