George Reny Margaret

George Reny Margaret is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and contempt of court. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

George Reny Margaret has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and child support.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sham Marriage	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Marriage of Convenience	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Immigration Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	George Reny Margaret has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

George Reny Margaret has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
DCMO Law Practice LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	CSW v CSX: Appeal Dismissed in Contempt of Court Case over Child Access(Jun 2023)
Belinda Ang Tang & Partners LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Gian Bee Choo v Meng Xianhui: Sham Marriage, Intestate Succession, and CPF Distribution(Jul 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of George Reny Margaret's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of George Reny Margaret's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	15,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CSW v CSX: Appeal Dismissed in Contempt of Court Case over Child Access 27 Jun 2023 CSW (Appellant)Lost	27 Jun 2023	CSW (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $15,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Gian Bee Choo v Meng Xianhui: Sham Marriage, Intestate Succession, and CPF Distribution 30 Jul 2019 Meng Xianhui (Defendant)Lost	30 Jul 2019	Meng Xianhui (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court declared the marriage between the Deceased and the Defendant was a sham marriage and dismissed the Defendant's claim to the Deceased's assets.