Gayathri Sivasurian

Gayathri Sivasurian is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and costs. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gayathri Sivasurian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gayathri Sivasurian has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Lee & Lee	2 cases	67% of cases	Long Well Group v Commerzbank: Costs Dispute After Breach of Contract Claim(Jul 2018) Long Well Group v Commerzbank: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation & Fiduciary Duty Claims(Mar 2018)
RHTLaw Asia LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Ratan Kumar Rai v Seah Hock Thiam: Fiduciary Duty, Accounting, and Cambodian Land Investment(Dec 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gayathri Sivasurian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.2
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	18.0 parties avg	8.0	33%
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Partial	27.0 parties avg	7.0	67%
Won	18.0 parties avg	8.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gayathri Sivasurian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	800,000.00	800,000.001 cases	1
USD	18,018,000.00	18,018,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ratan Kumar Rai v Seah Hock Thiam: Fiduciary Duty, Accounting, and Cambodian Land Investment 08 Dec 2021 Tan Teck Kee (Defendant)Lost	08 Dec 2021	Tan Teck Kee (Defendant): Account ordered on a wilful default basisAccount ordered on a wilful default basis.
2	Long Well Group v Commerzbank: Costs Dispute After Breach of Contract Claim 22 Jul 2018 First Power International Limited (Plaintiff)Won	22 Jul 2018	First Power International Limited (Plaintiff): Costs awarded against 3rd defendantCosts to be paid by the 3rd defendant to the plaintiffs fixed at $200,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Long Well Group v Commerzbank: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation & Fiduciary Duty Claims 15 Mar 2018 First Power International Limited (Plaintiff)Dismissed	15 Mar 2018	First Power International Limited (Plaintiff): Claim dismissedThe other sums claimed for, such as the PEPL Share Purchase Sum and PEPL Advance Payments have not been shown to be losses incurred by the plaintiffs as a result of CAMA and CAB’s failure to transfer the ownership of CAE to the plaintiffs.