Gan Seng Chee

Gan Seng Chee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and arbitration. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and admiralty and maritime law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	9 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	8 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	8 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Slot Charterparty	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Carriage of goods by sea	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freight Forwarding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Cargo Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unpaid Wages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Seng Chee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gan Seng Chee has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ang & Partners	9 cases	69% of cases	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34”: Stay of Proceedings for Foreign Arbitration(Oct 2010) ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39”: Dispute over Slot Charterparty Agreement and Foreign Arbitration(Oct 2010) ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34": Arrest of Vessel & Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration(Oct 2010)
Ang and Partners	3 cases	23% of cases	Tan Siok Yee v Chong Voon Kee Ivan: Determining Liability in Negligence for Motor Accident Injuries(Aug 2005) Smart Modular Technologies v Federal Express: Contract of Carriage & Bailment Dispute(Jun 2004) Pan United Shipping v Cendrawasih Shipping: Liability for Lost Cargo & Demise Charter(Feb 2004)
Benjamin Seow	1 cases	8% of cases	Chemical Industries v Global Shipping: Admiralty Jurisdiction, In Rem vs In Personam Action(Feb 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gan Seng Chee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	23%
Partial	33.3 parties avg	3.3	23%
Stayed	22.0 parties avg	2.0	15%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	8%
Won	42.5 parties avg	2.5	31%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	42.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gan Seng Chee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(7%)	7%
Lost	3(21%)	21%
Partial	3(21%)	21%
Stayed	2(14%)	14%
Withdrawn	1(7%)	7%
Won	4(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3
USD	1,486,729.78	743,364.892 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	4 121	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Stayed: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34”: Stay of Proceedings for Foreign Arbitration 24 Oct 2010 PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener)Partial	24 Oct 2010	PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener): Successful in partThe respondent successfully argued for a stay of proceedings in favor of foreign arbitration, but lost the appeal against setting aside the service of the Writ of Summons.
2	ANL Singapore Ltd v The “Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39”: Dispute over Slot Charterparty Agreement and Foreign Arbitration 24 Oct 2010 PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener)Won	24 Oct 2010	PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener): Stay of proceedings affirmedThe court affirmed the stay of proceedings in favor of foreign arbitration.
3	ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34": Arrest of Vessel & Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 18 Oct 2010 PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener)Stayed	18 Oct 2010	PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener): Proceedings stayedThe court affirmed the decision to stay the proceedings in favour of foreign arbitration.
4	ANL Singapore Ltd v The "Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39": Admiralty Claim, Beneficial Ownership & Arbitration 18 Oct 2010 PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener)Stayed	18 Oct 2010	PT Djakarta Lloyd (Persero) (Respondent, Intervener): Proceedings stayed in favour of arbitrationThe appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s decision to stay the proceedings in favour of foreign arbitration was dismissed.
5	UMCI Ltd v Tokio Marine: Marine Cargo Insurance Claim for Damaged Semiconductor Equipment 30 Oct 2008 Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	30 Oct 2008	Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the Defendant in the amount of US$1,240,000 plus interest at 5.33% from 6 June 2005.
6	Sin Chuen No 112: Master's Unpaid Wages Claim Against Vessel Owners and Union Bank of Taiwan's Intervention 07 Jan 2007 Union Bank of Taiwan (Respondent)Won	07 Jan 2007	Union Bank of Taiwan (Respondent): Successful Resistance to AmendmentResistance to the plaintiff’s claim came from the first interveners, the Union Bank of Taiwan (“the Bank”), who were the mortgagees of the vessel.
7	Chemical Industries v Global Shipping: Admiralty Jurisdiction, In Rem vs In Personam Action 19 Feb 2006 Chemical Industries (Far East) Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Feb 2006	Chemical Industries (Far East) Ltd (Plaintiff): Leave to amend writ grantedPlaintiffs were granted leave to amend their writ from an in rem form to an in personam form.
8	Tan Siok Yee v Chong Voon Kee Ivan: Determining Liability in Negligence for Motor Accident Injuries 28 Aug 2005 Chong Voon Kee Ivan (Defendant)Partial	28 Aug 2005	Chong Voon Kee Ivan (Defendant): Interlocutory judgmentInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiffs with costs based on 50% liability (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Smart Modular Technologies v Federal Express: Contract of Carriage & Bailment Dispute 28 Jun 2004 Sun Technosystems Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	28 Jun 2004	Sun Technosystems Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedSun Tech’s claim was dismissed with costs.
10	Pan United Shipping v Cendrawasih Shipping: Liability for Lost Cargo & Demise Charter 22 Feb 2004 Pan-United Shipping Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	22 Feb 2004	Pan-United Shipping Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages sought in the amount of $246,729.78 (assumed USD, as the damages were calculated in USD).
11	APL Co Pte Ltd v Voss Peer: Straight Bills of Lading & Delivery Obligations 02 Oct 2002 APL Co Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Oct 2002	APL Co Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Security for costs paid out to the respondent's solicitors (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Voss Peer v APL Co Pte Ltd: Carrier's Delivery Obligation & Bill of Lading 22 Apr 2002 APL Co Pte Ltd (Defendants, Appellants)Lost	22 Apr 2002	APL Co Pte Ltd (Defendants, Appellants): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; APL was found liable for delivering the cargo without production of the original bill of lading (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Lam Seng Hang Co Pte Ltd v The Insurance Corporation of Singapore Ltd: Marine Insurance Claim Dispute 15 Feb 2001 The Insurance Corporation of Singapore Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	15 Feb 2001	The Insurance Corporation of Singapore Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application for leave to appeal was dismissed.