Gabriel Peter

Gabriel Peter is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in garnishee proceedings and enforcement of foreign judgments. Their track record shows a 24.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 41% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gabriel Peter has demonstrated expertise across 81 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	11 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	10 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collateral Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Registration of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administration of Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loans	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Registration of Title	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indefeasibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Merchantable Quality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Malicious Falsehood	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Annulment of bankruptcy order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gabriel Peter has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gabriel Peter has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 17 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	17 cases	100% of cases	Budhrani v INTL FCStone: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, and Margin Calls in Silver Futures Trading(Jan 2024) Tecnomar & Associates v SBM Offshore: Breach of Contract Claim & Material Non-Disclosure in Service Out of Jurisdiction Application(Apr 2021) Daisho Development v Architects 61: Negligent Misrepresentation in Hotel Sale(Jan 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gabriel Peter's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 7 (41%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Lost	104.6 parties avg	4.6	59%
Partial	25.7 parties avg	5.7	12%
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	24%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2015	26.2 parties avg	6.2
2016	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gabriel Peter's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(6%)	6%
Lost	10(59%)	59%
Partial	2(12%)	12%
Won	4(24%)	24%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	216,000.00	24,000.009 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Budhrani v INTL FCStone: Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, and Margin Calls in Silver Futures Trading 23 Jan 2024 Rajesh Harichandra Budhrani (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Lost	23 Jan 2024	Rajesh Harichandra Budhrani (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Claim DismissedAll claims of the plaintiff were dismissed.
2	Tecnomar & Associates v SBM Offshore: Breach of Contract Claim & Material Non-Disclosure in Service Out of Jurisdiction Application 12 Apr 2021 Tecnomar & Associates Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	12 Apr 2021	Tecnomar & Associates Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with indemnity costs to be paid to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Daisho Development v Architects 61: Negligent Misrepresentation in Hotel Sale 20 Jan 2020 Daisho Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	20 Jan 2020	Daisho Development Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedDaisho's claim against Architects 61 was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Standard Chartered Bank v Chua Seng Kiat: Annulment of Bankruptcy Order Before Debt Proven 08 Oct 2019 Chua Seng Kiat (Defendant, Appellant)Won	08 Oct 2019	Chua Seng Kiat (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the annulment of the bankruptcy order was dismissed.
5	First Asia Capital Investments Ltd v Société Générale: Collateral Contracts & Misrepresentation 11 Apr 2017 First Asia Capital Investments Limited (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Apr 2017	First Asia Capital Investments Limited (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Chia Hang Kiu v Chia Kwok Yeo: Trust, Land Title, and Estate Dispute over Property Ownership 20 Sep 2016 Chia Hang Kiu (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Sep 2016	Chia Hang Kiu (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim that the defendants held two-thirds of the property on trust for the Late Father's estate was dismissed.
7	Yugoimport SDPR v Westacre Investments: Garnishee Orders & Express Trusts Dispute 30 Aug 2016 Deuteron (Asia) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	30 Aug 2016	Deuteron (Asia) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal against the decision to make the garnishee order against the bank absolute was allowed.
8	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Garnishee Order, Beneficial Ownership & Debt Determination 26 May 2015 Cajevac (Previously Known as Rudi Cajavec) (Defendant)Lost	26 May 2015	Cajevac (Previously Known as Rudi Cajavec) (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court found that the Other Parties failed to discharge their legal burden to demonstrate their ownership.
9	Coal & Oil Co LLC v GHCL Ltd: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 11 Mar 2015 Coal & Oil Co LLC (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Mar 2015	Coal & Oil Co LLC (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed; costs awarded to the defendant in the amount of $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Garnishee Proceedings & Beneficial Ownership of Funds 18 May 2011 The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (Judgment Debtor, Garnishee)Lost	18 May 2011	The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (Judgment Debtor, Garnishee): Judgment against Judgment DebtorSummons 5377 dismissed; provisional garnishee orders made final; Judgment Debtor to pay costs of the garnishee proceedings to the Judgment Creditor. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Tan Keaw Chong v Chua Tiong Guan: Loan Recovery & Oral Contract Dispute 14 Jan 2010 Tan Keaw Chong (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Jan 2010	Tan Keaw Chong (Plaintiff): Claim Dismissed, Recovery AllowedPlaintiff's claim based on oral joint-venture agreement was dismissed, but the plaintiff was allowed to recover $196,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport SDPR: Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgment 29 Dec 2008 The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (Also known as Jugoimport – SDPR) (Respondent)Lost	29 Dec 2008	The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (Also known as Jugoimport – SDPR) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	WBG Network v Meridian Life: Defamation & Malicious Falsehood in MLM Algae Product Sales 16 Jul 2008 WBG Network (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	16 Jul 2008	WBG Network (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for the plaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	WBG Network v Sunny Daisy: Summary Judgment & Admissibility of Evidence 11 Jan 2007 WBG Network (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	11 Jan 2007	WBG Network (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Westacre Investments Inc v Yugoimport-SDPR: Enforcement of Foreign Judgment in Singapore 27 Nov 2006 Yugoimport-SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) (Judgment Debtor)Won	27 Nov 2006	Yugoimport-SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) (Judgment Debtor): Application to set aside registration grantedThe judgment debtor's application to set aside the registration of the judgment was granted.
16	Bakery Mart v Ng Wei Teck: Setting Aside Consent Judgment for Receivership Claim 04 Oct 2004 Bakery Mart Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Oct 2004	Bakery Mart Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedOriginating summons dismissed with costs to Culina fixed at $6,000 and costs to D1 and D2 fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Bakery Mart v Sincere Watch: Unconditional Leave to Defend Granted in Corporate Restructuring Dispute 01 Sep 2003 Bakery Mart Pte Ltd (In Receivership) (Defendant, Appellant)Won	01 Sep 2003	Bakery Mart Pte Ltd (In Receivership) (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; unconditional leave to defend granted.