Foo Yuk Lin

Foo Yuk Lin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and summary judgement. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and disclosure of documents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Amendments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fire Damage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreseeability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Yuk Lin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Foo Yuk Lin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Foo Chia Partnership	5 cases	100% of cases	Saatchi & Saatchi v Tan Hun Ling: Negligence, Fire Damage, and Landlord Liability(Dec 2005) United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Summary Judgment Time Limit and Amendment of Pleadings(Aug 2004) United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Striking Out Summary Judgment Application for Breach of Rules of Court(Aug 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Foo Yuk Lin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	53.7 parties avg	3.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Foo Yuk Lin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	3,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Saatchi & Saatchi v Tan Hun Ling: Negligence, Fire Damage, and Landlord Liability 14 Dec 2005 Zenith Media Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Dec 2005	Zenith Media Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiffs with damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Summary Judgment Time Limit and Amendment of Pleadings 30 Aug 2004 Lee Lip Hiong (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 Aug 2004	Lee Lip Hiong (Defendant, Respondent): Successful in resisting appealThe first defendant successfully resisted the plaintiff's appeal and was awarded costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Striking Out Summary Judgment Application for Breach of Rules of Court 05 Aug 2004 Lee Lip Hiong (Defendant)Won	05 Aug 2004	Lee Lip Hiong (Defendant): Application grantedApplication to strike out the plaintiffs’ prayer for summary judgment granted; costs awarded in favor of Lee. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Extension of Time for Summary Judgment Application 20 Jul 2004 Lee Lip Hiong (Defendant)Won	20 Jul 2004	Lee Lip Hiong (Defendant): Successful OppositionOpposed United Engineers’ application, which was ultimately dismissed.
5	Tan v Loh: Negligence, Traffic Light Dispute, and Motor Vehicle Accident 26 Sep 2000 Bernice Amelia Tan (Plaintiff)Won	26 Sep 2000	Bernice Amelia Tan (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in her favour, finding the defendant wholly to blame for the accident. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.