Foo Ho Chew

Foo Ho Chew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and appellate practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal liability of solicitor for costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conservation Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Ho Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Foo Ho Chew has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
H C Law Practice	2 cases	67% of cases	Cheng Hoe Soon v Ezekiel Peter Latimer: Negligence Claim Struck Out Due to Solicitor's Conduct(Mar 2023) Zhou Wenjing v Shun Heng Credit: Application for Permission to Appeal Default Judgment(Dec 2022)
Heng Leong & Srinivasan	1 cases	33% of cases	PP v Development 26: Conservation Area Violations & Sentencing(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Foo Ho Chew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Foo Ho Chew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	12,000.00	12,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cheng Hoe Soon v Ezekiel Peter Latimer: Negligence Claim Struck Out Due to Solicitor's Conduct 02 Mar 2023 Cheng Hoe Soon (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	02 Mar 2023	Cheng Hoe Soon (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed, SOC reinstated.
2	Zhou Wenjing v Shun Heng Credit: Application for Permission to Appeal Default Judgment 13 Dec 2022 Zhou Wenjing (Applicant)Won	13 Dec 2022	Zhou Wenjing (Applicant): Application AllowedApplicant's application for permission to appeal was allowed.
3	PP v Development 26: Conservation Area Violations & Sentencing 12 Nov 2014 Development 26 Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	12 Nov 2014	Development 26 Pte Ltd (Respondent): Fined $12,000The respondent was fined $6,000 for each of the two charges, totaling $12,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).