Elaine Tay

Elaine Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and security for costs. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Elaine Tay has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defective Works	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Investment Linked Policies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Design	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Workmanship	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Elaine Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Elaine Tay has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	American International Assurance Co Ltd v Wong Cherng Yaw: Interim Payments & Insurer's Mistake in Investment-Linked Policies(Jun 2009) American International Assurance v Wong Cherng Yaw: Interim Payment & Fund Switching(Apr 2009) Jurong Town Corp v Sembcorp: Breach of Contract over Steel Stiffeners Design & Construction(Apr 2009)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	Cassa di Risparmio v Rals: Stay of Action, Arbitration Agreement, Promissory Notes(Oct 2015)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	17% of cases	Stork Technology v First Capital: Notice Provision as Condition Precedent in Insurance Policy(Jul 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Elaine Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.7 parties avg	5.7	50%
Partial	111.0 parties avg	11.0	17%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	47.0 parties avg	7.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Elaine Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,019,300.00	254,825.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Cassa di Risparmio v Rals: Stay of Action, Arbitration Agreement, Promissory Notes 15 Oct 2015 Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenza SpA (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	15 Oct 2015	Cassa di Risparmio di Parma e Piacenza SpA (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, stay of proceedings lifted. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	American International Assurance Co Ltd v Wong Cherng Yaw: Interim Payments & Insurer's Mistake in Investment-Linked Policies 25 Jun 2009 American International Assurance Co, Ltd (Appellant)Partial	25 Jun 2009	American International Assurance Co, Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against interim payment order partially dismissed; interim payment amount varied to $600,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	American International Assurance v Wong Cherng Yaw: Interim Payment & Fund Switching 16 Apr 2009 American International Assurance Co, Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Apr 2009	American International Assurance Co, Ltd (Plaintiff): Interim Payment OrderedThe court ordered the plaintiff to make an interim payment of $1,019,300 to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Jurong Town Corp v Sembcorp: Breach of Contract over Steel Stiffeners Design & Construction 16 Apr 2009 Sembcorp Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	16 Apr 2009	Sembcorp Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Ong Jane Rebecca v Pricewaterhousecoopers: Security for Costs & Access to Courts 05 Feb 2009 Arul Chew & Partners (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	05 Feb 2009	Arul Chew & Partners (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedCross-appeal dismissed; security for costs reduced on plaintiff's appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Stork Technology v First Capital: Notice Provision as Condition Precedent in Insurance Policy 02 Jul 2006 First Capital Insurance Ltd (Defendant)Won	02 Jul 2006	First Capital Insurance Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantOriginating Summons dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).