Edmund Tham

Edmund Tham is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in assignment law and limitation. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edmund Tham has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in estoppel and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Estoppel	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bunker Fuel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edmund Tham has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Equatorial Marine v Owner of Vessel “Bunga Melati 5”: Agency by Estoppel in Bunker Fuel Contracts(Mar 2016) Cytec Industries v APP Chemicals: Limitation Act & Acknowledgment of Debt(Aug 2009) Lanxess v APP Chemicals: Assignment of Debt & Civil Law Act(Jan 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edmund Tham's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edmund Tham's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	10,199,553.12	10,199,553.121 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Equatorial Marine v Owner of Vessel “Bunga Melati 5”: Agency by Estoppel in Bunker Fuel Contracts 28 Mar 2016 OWNER OF THE VESSEL(S) “BUNGA MELATI 5” (Respondent, Defendant)Won	28 Mar 2016	OWNER OF THE VESSEL(S) “BUNGA MELATI 5” (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Cytec Industries v APP Chemicals: Limitation Act & Acknowledgment of Debt 05 Aug 2009 Cytec Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	05 Aug 2009	Cytec Industries Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeals DismissedRegistrar's Appeals dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Lanxess v APP Chemicals: Assignment of Debt & Civil Law Act 29 Jan 2009 Lanxess Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jan 2009	Lanxess Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe defendant is to pay the debt, contractual interest at the rate of 2% above the average prime lending rate of the Association of Banks in Singapore, as well as the plaintiff’s costs to be agreed or taxed.