Edmund Chain

Edmund Chain is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and subcontracts. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edmund Chain has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory obligations	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Subcontracts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Claims by subcontractor	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Delegation of Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Chain has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edmund Chain has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chelliah & Kiang LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Yew San Construction v Ley Choon: Subcontract Dispute over Earthworks and Liquidated Damages(Dec 2019) MCST Plan No 3322 v Tiong Aik: Non-Delegable Duty in Construction Defects(Jul 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edmund Chain's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edmund Chain's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,076,716.73	1,038,358.372 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yew San Construction v Ley Choon: Subcontract Dispute over Earthworks and Liquidated Damages 04 Dec 2019 Ley Choon Constructions and Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	04 Dec 2019	Ley Choon Constructions and Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartCounterclaim allowed in part in the amount of $2,076,716.73 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	MCST Plan No 3322 v Tiong Aik: Non-Delegable Duty in Construction Defects 03 Jul 2016 TIONG AIK CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD (Respondent)Won	03 Jul 2016	TIONG AIK CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against Tiong Aik Construction Pte Ltd was dismissed, and costs of the appeal were awarded to the respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.