Devinder K Rai

Devinder K Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in conflict of laws and trust law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 56% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Devinder K Rai has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dividends	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accountancy Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inspection of Accounting Records	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Devinder K Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Devinder K Rai has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
ACIES Law Corporation	9 cases	100% of cases	Yap Son On v Ding Pei Zhen: Contractual Interpretation and Share Allotment Dispute(Dec 2016) Sandz Solutions v Strategic Worldwide: Dividends Dispute & Unwinding of Lexicon SPA(May 2014) Ong Hong Kiat v RIQ Pte Ltd: Share Transfer Dispute & Right to Inspect Company Records(Jul 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Devinder K Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 5 (56%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.5 parties avg	4.5	44%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	22%
Won	33.3 parties avg	3.3	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Devinder K Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(44%)	44%
Partial	2(22%)	22%
Won	3(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
EUR	941,893.05	941,893.051 cases	1
SGD	13,000.00	3,250.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yap Son On v Ding Pei Zhen: Contractual Interpretation and Share Allotment Dispute 18 Dec 2016 Yap Son On (Appellant)Partial	18 Dec 2016	Yap Son On (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppellant to pay the Respondent a sum of €941,893.05 less HK$6,389,910.21 instead of the sum originally ordered by the Judge.
2	Sandz Solutions v Strategic Worldwide: Dividends Dispute & Unwinding of Lexicon SPA 20 May 2014 Strategic Worldwide Assets Ltd (Respondent)Lost	20 May 2014	Strategic Worldwide Assets Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe Judge’s decision below that Strategic is entitled to a 25% share of the $4m Dividends is overturned. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ong Hong Kiat v RIQ Pte Ltd: Share Transfer Dispute & Right to Inspect Company Records 16 Jul 2013 Ong Hong Kiat (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	16 Jul 2013	Ong Hong Kiat (Applicant, Respondent): Application DismissedMr. Ong's application for leave to inspect RIQ's accounting records was dismissed.
4	Wong Chong Yue v Wong Chong Thai: Dispute over Express Trust and Loan Recoverability 10 Jan 2011 Wong Chong Thai (Defendant)Won	10 Jan 2011	Wong Chong Thai (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's action against the defendant was dismissed, with costs to be taxed to the defendant.
5	Segar Ashok v Koh Fonn Lyn Veronica: Defamation and Partnership Dispute over Jewellery Business 26 May 2010 Segar Ashok (Plaintiff, Defendant)Won	26 May 2010	Segar Ashok (Plaintiff, Defendant): Claim AllowedJudgment for Plaintiff on libel claim; damages awarded in the amount of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Wing Hak Man v Bio-Treat Technology: Forum Non Conveniens & Conspiracy 28 Sep 2008 Jerry Yip Wai Leung (Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2008	Jerry Yip Wai Leung (Defendant): Stay Application AllowedStay application allowed with costs fixed at $3000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria: Jurisdiction over Foreign Immovables & Estoppel in Matrimonial Disputes 31 Mar 2008 Murakami Takako (Plaintiff)Partial	31 Mar 2008	Murakami Takako (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partAmendment to include movables (Westpac Bank accounts) permitted, but not for foreign immovables in Australia and Indonesia.
8	Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria: Amendment of Defence, Foreign Judgments, Forum Non Conveniens 11 Jan 2007 Murakami Takako (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Jan 2007	Murakami Takako (Plaintiff): Application to prevent amendment of defence deniedThe plaintiff's application to prevent the defendants from amending their defence and adding a fourth defendant was denied.
9	Ling Uk Choon v Public Accountants Board: Appeal Against Censure for Improper Conduct 27 Jun 2004 Public Accountants Board (Respondent)Lost	27 Jun 2004	Public Accountants Board (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the Public Accountants Board was allowed.