Collin Seah

Collin Seah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Collin Seah has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	5 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Collision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Confession and avoidance defence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Collin Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Collin Seah has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	3 cases	60% of cases	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy(Oct 2012) Ng Sing King v PSA: Minority Oppression & Winding Up in Shipping Logistics(Jan 2005) Ng Sing King v PSA International: Striking Out Claims Against Non-Shareholders in Oppression Action(Mar 2003)
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Duty to Account and Burden of Proof in Trust Dispute(Nov 2017)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	20% of cases	Ah Lam II & Pu 1804 v Bonito: Appeal for Extension of Time to File Damages Assessment(Oct 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Collin Seah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.1
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Neutral	112.0 parties avg	12.0	20%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	20%
Won	38.0 parties avg	8.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2005	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2012	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Collin Seah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,526,048.71	3,526,048.711 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Alphire Group Pte Ltd v Law Chau Loon: Duty to Account and Burden of Proof in Trust Dispute 15 Nov 2017 Alphire Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	15 Nov 2017	Alphire Group Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of SGD 3,526,048.71 plus interest. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy 30 Oct 2012 Lim Eng Hock Peter (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant)Partial	30 Oct 2012	Lim Eng Hock Peter (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartPeter Lim's claim of conspiracy against Margaret Tung and Lin Jian Wei was partially allowed.
3	Ng Sing King v PSA: Minority Oppression & Winding Up in Shipping Logistics 17 Jan 2005 P and O Australia Ports Pty Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Won	17 Jan 2005	P and O Australia Ports Pty Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully defended against the oppression claim.
4	Ng Sing King v PSA International: Striking Out Claims Against Non-Shareholders in Oppression Action 17 Mar 2003 Elogicity International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	17 Mar 2003	Elogicity International Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe Fifth Defendant was not involved in these applications and was therefore unrepresented at the hearing of these appeals.
5	Ah Lam II & Pu 1804 v Bonito: Appeal for Extension of Time to File Damages Assessment 18 Oct 2000 The Owners of the Ship or Vessel "Bonito" (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	18 Oct 2000	The Owners of the Ship or Vessel "Bonito" (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, the court granted extension of time for filing the reference to registrar for assessment of damages to the plaintiff.