Colin Phan

Colin Phan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Colin Phan has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trademarks and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trademarks	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Transactions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Option Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforceability of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Colin Phan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Colin Phan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Infinitus Law Corporation	2 cases	40% of cases	Ong Kok Ming v Happy Valley Holdings: Enforceability of Property Option Agreement(Aug 2011) Vicplas v Allfit: Copyright Infringement, Passing Off, Conspiracy in Solvent Cement Market(Dec 2010)
Gateway Law Corporation	2 cases	40% of cases	Perdigao v Barilla: Extension of Time for Appeal Service in Trademark Opposition(Sep 2009) MediaCorp News v Astro: Trade Mark Registration Refusal & Likelihood of Confusion(Aug 2009)
L F Violet Netto	1 cases	20% of cases	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v National University of Singapore: Breach of Contract, Torts, and Discovery Dispute(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Colin Phan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	80%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Colin Phan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Won	4(80%)	80%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,001,500.00	250,375.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie v National University of Singapore: Breach of Contract, Torts, and Discovery Dispute 20 Nov 2014 Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Nov 2014	Ten Leu Jiun Jeanne-Marie (Plaintiff): Application DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed with costs fixed at $1,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ong Kok Ming v Happy Valley Holdings: Enforceability of Property Option Agreement 30 Aug 2011 Ong Kok Ming (alias Ong Henardi) (Plaintiff)Won	30 Aug 2011	Ong Kok Ming (alias Ong Henardi) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $1,000,000 plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Vicplas v Allfit: Copyright Infringement, Passing Off, Conspiracy in Solvent Cement Market 23 Dec 2010 Splendour Corporation Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	23 Dec 2010	Splendour Corporation Pte Ltd (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe third defendant's appeal was allowed.
4	Perdigao v Barilla: Extension of Time for Appeal Service in Trademark Opposition 17 Sep 2009 Perdigao Agroindustrial SA (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	17 Sep 2009	Perdigao Agroindustrial SA (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal for extension of time to serve Originating Summons was allowed. Costs to the defendant at the appeal and below on an indemnity basis to be borne by the plaintiff’s solicitors (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	MediaCorp News v Astro: Trade Mark Registration Refusal & Likelihood of Confusion 02 Aug 2009 Astro All Asia Networks PLC (Respondent)Won	02 Aug 2009	Astro All Asia Networks PLC (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.