Chu Hua Yi

Chu Hua Yi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 26 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and costs. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 16 complex cases, representing 62% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated expertise across 87 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	10 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	8 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lasting Power of Attorney	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moratoria	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deed Poll Structure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Video Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied authority of agent	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disqualification	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Effect of bankruptcy on directorship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Memorandum and articles of association	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Effect	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Effect of setting aside bankruptcy order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency by estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tax Evasion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minimum Legal Obligation Rule	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Case Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pre-judgment interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chu Hua Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chu Hua Yi has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
FC Legal Asia LLC	11 cases	42% of cases	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over Bond Amount Release and Pre-Judgment Interest(Oct 2024) Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over US$10 Million Bond Account & Contingent Claims(Aug 2024) Peck Wee Boon v Lim Poh Goon: Costs Allocation After Dismissal of Claims(May 2024)
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	8 cases	31% of cases	Eng Chiet Shoong v Cheong Soh Chin: Quantum Meruit & Implied Contracts Dispute(Jul 2016) JES International v Yang Shushan: Breach of Contract, Agency by Estoppel, Damages(Apr 2016) Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Private Equity Investments & Accounting(Jul 2015)
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP	6 cases	23% of cases	MSP4GE Asia v MSP Global: Constructive Trust, Breach of Trust & Misrepresentation(Jan 2019) Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Account on Wilful Default(Sep 2018) Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Res Judicata & Issue Estoppel in Accounting Phase(Sep 2018)
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC	1 cases	4% of cases	Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction: Summary Judgment & Pleading Requirements(Jan 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chu Hua Yi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 16 (62%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	124.1 parties avg	4.1	46%
Partial	65.8 parties avg	5.8	23%
Won	95.4 parties avg	5.4	35%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	26.4 parties avg	6.4
2009	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2016	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	36.7 parties avg	6.7
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	64.6 parties avg	4.6
2024	43.6 parties avg	3.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chu Hua Yi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(44%)	44%
Partial	6(22%)	22%
Won	9(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,118,297.20	465,299.7511 cases	11
USD	17,500,000.00	5,833,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	6 411	Lost: 4 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2024	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 26 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over Bond Amount Release and Pre-Judgment Interest 17 Oct 2024 Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant)Partial	17 Oct 2024	Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant): Partial WinTIL was awarded $790,500 in costs and disbursements, but pre-judgment interest was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over US$10 Million Bond Account & Contingent Claims 19 Aug 2024 Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant)Won	19 Aug 2024	Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantJudgment for the Claimant; the court ordered the closure of the bond account and the return of the funds to the claimant (assumed USD, as the bond amount was deposited in USD).
3	Peck Wee Boon v Lim Poh Goon: Costs Allocation After Dismissal of Claims 07 May 2024 Ding Siew Peng Angel (Plaintiff)Lost	07 May 2024	Ding Siew Peng Angel (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claims against the defendants were dismissed.
4	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Cross-Border Dispute 28 Apr 2024 Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant)Lost	28 Apr 2024	Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant): Application for further security for costs grantedTranspac Investments Limited must provide security for costs in favour of TIH in the sum claimed ie, $500,000 by 15 May 2024 by way of a solicitor’s undertaking or otherwise in a form reasonably satisfactory to TIH. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Babel Holding Ltd Scheme of Arrangement: Leave to Convene Meeting, Creditor Classification 23 Nov 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Non-party)Lost	23 Nov 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Non-party): Objections DismissedObjections to the application were dismissed.
6	Parastate Labs Inc v. Wang Li: Appeal on Quantum of Mareva Injunction for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 24 Sep 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Appellant, Claimant)Won	24 Sep 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Appellant, Claimant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; injunction granted shall cover assets of up to US$5 million.
7	Europ Assistance Holding SA v ONB Technologies Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application Dismissed 15 Aug 2023 Europ Assistance Holding SA (Claimant)Lost	15 Aug 2023	Europ Assistance Holding SA (Claimant): Application DismissedWinding up application dismissed; ordered to pay $7,000 in costs to ONB Holdings Pte Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Chang Chee Kheo v Fatfish: Forum Non Conveniens & Arbitration Agreement 15 Aug 2023 Fatfish Capital Limited (Defendant)Lost	15 Aug 2023	Fatfish Capital Limited (Defendant): Stay Application DismissedApplication for stay of proceedings dismissed.
9	Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Mareva Injunction Quantum Dispute 25 May 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant)Partial	25 May 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant): Mareva injunction granted for a reduced quantumMareva injunction granted for US$2.5 million instead of the US$5 million sought.
10	Parastate Labs Inc v Wang Li: Stay of Court Proceedings Pending Arbitration 27 Feb 2023 Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant)Lost	27 Feb 2023	Parastate Labs, Inc (Claimant): Case management stay grantedCase management stay of the action was granted pending the resolution of the arbitration between Parastate and Babel Asia.
11	Goh Seng Heng v Wang Xiaopu: Appeal Against Contempt of Court Sentence for Withholding Information 26 Jun 2022 Goh Seng Heng (Appellant)Lost	26 Jun 2022	Goh Seng Heng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the sentence of seven days' imprisonment for contempt of court was dismissed.
12	MSP4GE Asia v MSP Global: Constructive Trust, Breach of Trust & Misrepresentation 30 Jan 2019 Tony Antonius Lie (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jan 2019	Tony Antonius Lie (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court declared that the Balance Sum in the amount of USD 479,233.60 is held by the 1st Defendant on trust for the 1st Plaintiff and ordered that the Balance Sum together with interest thereon at the rate of 5.33% per annum from the date of the Writ be paid by the 1st Defendant to the 1st Plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Account on Wilful Default 27 Sep 2018 Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2018	Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedClaim allowed in part; the exact monetary amount will be determined after hearing parties on interest, costs, and the form of the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Res Judicata & Issue Estoppel in Accounting Phase 27 Sep 2018 Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff)Won	27 Sep 2018	Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff): Judgment in favor of PlaintiffThe court held that the defendants are precluded from arguing that there was an overarching agreement for the plaintiffs to pay the costs and expenses incurred by the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Bachmeer Capital v Ong Chih Ching: Video Link Evidence in International Commercial Dispute 12 Feb 2018 BACHMEER CAPITAL LIMITED (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	12 Feb 2018	BACHMEER CAPITAL LIMITED (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Application allowed in part and dismissed in part.Application allowed in part and dismissed in part.
16	TYC Investment Pte Ltd v Chan Siew Lee: Effect of Bankruptcy on Directorship & Articles of Association 14 Aug 2017 TYC Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Aug 2017	TYC Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Prayers DismissedPrayers (1), (2) and (3) of TYC’s application were dismissed and no order was made on prayer 4 of TYC’s application.
17	Law Society v Sum Chong Mun: Professional Misconduct in Lasting Power of Attorney Certification 10 Apr 2017 The Law Society of Singapore (Appellant)Won	10 Apr 2017	The Law Society of Singapore (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; due cause for disciplinary action was shown against both Sum and Kay. Sum was suspended for one year, and Kay was suspended for 30 months. Costs of the proceedings awarded to the Law Society (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Eng Chiet Shoong v Cheong Soh Chin: Quantum Meruit & Implied Contracts Dispute 12 Jul 2016 Wee Boo Tee (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	12 Jul 2016	Wee Boo Tee (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe Wees are obliged to pay management fees for the initial private equity funds until 8 July 2012 (assumed USD, as the initial agreement was in USD).
19	JES International v Yang Shushan: Breach of Contract, Agency by Estoppel, Damages 04 Apr 2016 JES International Holdings Limited (Plaintiff)Won	04 Apr 2016	JES International Holdings Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages assessed in the sum of $2,088,600 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Private Equity Investments & Accounting 09 Jul 2015 Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff)Won	09 Jul 2015	Wee Boo Tee (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffTransfer order, accounting order, and payment order granted.
21	Lew Kiat Beng v Hiap Seng: Derivative Action & Discovery Obligations 20 Nov 2011 Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	20 Nov 2011	Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Appellants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Aldabe Fermin v Standard Chartered Bank: Wrongful Dismissal & Disciplinary Hearing 21 Apr 2010 Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant)Lost	21 Apr 2010	Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant): Claim Partially DismissedThe defendant was found liable for wrongful dismissal, but the damages were limited. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Law Chin Eng v Hiap Seng & Co: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 29 Sep 2009 Lau Chin Whatt (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Sep 2009	Lau Chin Whatt (Plaintiff): Leave granted in partLeave is granted to bring an action on behalf of the company against the proposed defendants on some complaints.
24	K Solutions v NUS: Striking Out for Document Destruction & Discovery Obligations 15 Jun 2009 K Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	15 Jun 2009	K Solutions Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Claim DismissedK Solutions' claim for wrongful termination was dismissed.
25	Law Chin Eng v Lau Chin Hu: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty to Company 29 Oct 2008 Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	29 Oct 2008	Hiap Seng & Co Pte Ltd (Defendant): Successful in striking out claimDefendants' application to strike out paragraphs 22 to 28 and prayer 12 of the Statement of Claim was granted.
26	Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction: Summary Judgment & Pleading Requirements 24 Jan 2008 Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	24 Jan 2008	Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal Partially AllowedAppeal partially allowed; summary judgment granted for $347,030 against Lim and $426,700 against Lim and Tan (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).