Christopher Goh

Christopher Goh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and trade secrets. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Christopher Goh has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sale of Property	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Co-ownership	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Scaffolding Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Goh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Christopher Goh has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ang and Partners	2 cases	50% of cases	Stratech Systems Ltd v Nyam Chiu Shin: Trade Secrets, Confidential Information, Inducement of Breach of Contract(Aug 2004) Stratech Systems v Guthrie Engineering: Quantum Meruit & Contractual Obligations in VEPS Project(Jul 2004)
Ang & Partners	1 cases	25% of cases	Thyssen Hunnebeck v TTJ Civil Engineering: Discovery of Documents in Scaffolding Contract Dispute(Oct 2002)
Goh Phai Cheng LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Wong Kim Wan v Leong Ong Meng: Partition and Sale of Co-Owned Property Dispute(Oct 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Christopher Goh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Christopher Goh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,000.00	333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wong Kim Wan v Leong Ong Meng: Partition and Sale of Co-Owned Property Dispute 27 Oct 2010 Wong Kim Wan (alias Wong Loretta) (Plaintiff)Partial	27 Oct 2010	Wong Kim Wan (alias Wong Loretta) (Plaintiff): Order for sale of property grantedOrder for sale of property granted, with both parties to appoint estate agents to jointly market the property at a minimum price of $300,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Stratech Systems Ltd v Nyam Chiu Shin: Trade Secrets, Confidential Information, Inducement of Breach of Contract 10 Aug 2004 Guthrie Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	10 Aug 2004	Guthrie Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim allowed in partJudgment for the plaintiff against the third defendant on the ground of inducing a breach of contract, but only nominal damages of $1,000 were awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Stratech Systems v Guthrie Engineering: Quantum Meruit & Contractual Obligations in VEPS Project 11 Jul 2004 Guthrie Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 Jul 2004	Guthrie Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissedDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
4	Thyssen Hunnebeck v TTJ Civil Engineering: Discovery of Documents in Scaffolding Contract Dispute 20 Oct 2002 TTJ Civil Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	20 Oct 2002	TTJ Civil Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the order for discovery of documents was granted against the defendant.