Christopher Daniel

Christopher Daniel is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Christopher Daniel has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Products Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Club Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Association Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Marine Paints	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Marine Coatings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Christopher Daniel has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Christopher Daniel has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill	5 cases	83% of cases	Keppel FELS v International Coatings: Liability for Defective Marine Paint & Soluble Salt Contamination(May 2002) Lau Ah Lang v Chan Huang Seng: Validity of Zu-Lin Temple Association EOGM & Management Committee Election(Jul 2001) Seah Chwee Lim v Scan Electronics: Professional Negligence & Property Title Dispute(Jun 2000)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	Re CTA: Applicants' Admission to the Bar Adjourned Due to Cheating on Bar Exam(Apr 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Christopher Daniel's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Lost	26.4 parties avg	6.4	33%
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	17%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	35.8 parties avg	5.8
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Christopher Daniel's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(14%)	14%
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Neutral	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6.00	2.003 cases	3
USD	6,807,080.00	6,807,080.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re CTA: Applicants' Admission to the Bar Adjourned Due to Cheating on Bar Exam 17 Apr 2022 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	17 Apr 2022	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore agreed with the Attorney General's proposal to adjourn the applications.
2	Keppel FELS v International Coatings: Liability for Defective Marine Paint & Soluble Salt Contamination 27 May 2002 International Coatings Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	27 May 2002	International Coatings Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the Second Defendant dismissed with costs.
3	Lau Ah Lang v Chan Huang Seng: Validity of Zu-Lin Temple Association EOGM & Management Committee Election 09 Jul 2001 Lau Ah Lang (Plaintiff)Won	09 Jul 2001	Lau Ah Lang (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; the appointment of the defendants as the seventh management committee was declared null and void.
4	Seah Chwee Lim v Scan Electronics: Professional Negligence & Property Title Dispute 29 Jun 2000 Scan Electronics (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	29 Jun 2000	Scan Electronics (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe plaintiff's appeal was allowed in part, allowing the claim for compensation paid to tenants and costs incurred for applying to the Tenants Compensation Board. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Arul Chandran v William J. Gartshore: Breach of Contract & Unlawful Removal from Tanglin Club Committee 09 Mar 2000 Kenneth Chew Keng Seng (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2000	Kenneth Chew Keng Seng (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantNominal damages of $1 awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	LKM Investment v Cathay Theatres: Restraining Winding Up Petition Based on Statutory Demand Validity & Abuse of Process 20 Jan 2000 LKM Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Jan 2000	LKM Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application AllowedThe court allowed LKM's application, restraining Cathay from presenting a winding up petition based on the statutory demand.