Ch’ng Chin Leong James

Ch’ng Chin Leong James is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in copyrights and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in commercial law and copyrights.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Commercial Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Rights Management Information	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Parallel Imports	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ch’ng Chin Leong James has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ch’ng Chin Leong James has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
A. Ang, Seah & Hoe	2 cases	100% of cases	FUJIFILM v PTC Business Systems: Trade Mark, Copyright, Passing Off(Nov 2021) Gomez v Bird & Bird: Professional Negligence Claim for Failure to Recover Debt(Oct 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ch’ng Chin Leong James's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.6 parties avg	3.6	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	23.6 parties avg	3.6

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ch’ng Chin Leong James's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	100,000.00	50,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	FUJIFILM v PTC Business Systems: Trade Mark, Copyright, Passing Off 29 Nov 2021 FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp (Plaintiff)Won	29 Nov 2021	FUJIFILM Business Innovation Corp (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInjunction, delivery up and forfeiture or destruction; and the order for an inquiry as to damages, or at the plaintiffs’ election in the alternative, an account of profits, or statutory damages in lieu of damages, in respect of the infringement of the copyright in the 3rd plaintiff’s computer software/firmware in the relevant Fuji Xerox Equipment and the infringement of the 3rd plaintiff’s rights in the rights management information in such computer software/firmware. Additional damages in the sum of $100,000. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Gomez v Bird & Bird: Professional Negligence Claim for Failure to Recover Debt 11 Oct 2021 Boey Swee Siang (Defendant)Won	11 Oct 2021	Boey Swee Siang (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the defendant's costs on the standard basis up to the service of the offer to settle and thereafter on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).