Ching Meng Hang

Ching Meng Hang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in international arbitration act and arbitration. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and international arbitration act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Procedural fairness	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Due Process	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ching Meng Hang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ching Meng Hang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	SECC Holdings v Helios PV: Garnishee Application, Assignment, Contract Formation(Aug 2024) CXG v CXI: Enforcing Interim Measures in Singapore-Seated Arbitration(Sep 2023) China Machine v Jaguar Energy: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Feb 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ching Meng Hang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.5 parties avg	4.5	75%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ching Meng Hang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Partial	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	239,250.93	119,625.472 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SECC Holdings v Helios PV: Garnishee Application, Assignment, Contract Formation 19 Aug 2024 Sinohydro Corporation Limited (Singapore Branch) (Garnishee)Partial	19 Aug 2024	Sinohydro Corporation Limited (Singapore Branch) (Garnishee): Appeal Dismissed in partAppeal dismissed regarding the 239K Retention Sum. The court found that the 239K Retention Sum was a contingent debt that could not be garnished. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CXG v CXI: Enforcing Interim Measures in Singapore-Seated Arbitration 11 Sep 2023 CXJ (Defendant)Lost	11 Sep 2023	CXJ (Defendant): Application dismissedThe court found that forum non conveniens principles do not apply to the enforcement of domestic interim measures and dismissed the Stay Applications with costs.
3	China Machine v Jaguar Energy: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 27 Feb 2020 China Machine New Energy Corporation (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	27 Feb 2020	China Machine New Energy Corporation (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedCMNC's appeal to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.
4	Asplenium Land v Lam Chye Shing: Legal Professional Privilege for In-House Counsel 21 Feb 2019 CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	21 Feb 2019	CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application AllowedApplication allowed; declaratory and injunctive reliefs granted in respect of the Item 3 and Item 4 documents. Costs of the application and reasonable disbursements to be paid by CKR to Asplenium, the quantum of which was to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.