Chew Yun Ping, Joanne

Chew Yun Ping, Joanne is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and personal injury. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Executors	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Meetings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fibromyalgia	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chew Yun Ping, Joanne has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramdas & Wong	2 cases	67% of cases	Hoie Kok Hing v Hoie Tip Fong: Trust, Probate, and Administration Dispute over Property Shares(Jun 2023) Ling Diung Kwong v Bo Tien Temple: Termination of Trustee & Membership Dispute(Jul 2017)
Salem Ibrahim LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Mykytowych v V I P Hotel: Negligence Claim for Hotel Lobby Slip and Fall Resulting in Knee Fracture and Alleged Complex Regional Pain Syndrome(May 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chew Yun Ping, Joanne's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.8
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	26.3 parties avg	6.3	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chew Yun Ping, Joanne's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	19,005.12	9,502.562 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hoie Kok Hing v Hoie Tip Fong: Trust, Probate, and Administration Dispute over Property Shares 21 Jun 2023 Hoie Tip Fong (Defendant)Won	21 Jun 2023	Hoie Tip Fong (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs.
2	Ling Diung Kwong v Bo Tien Temple: Termination of Trustee & Membership Dispute 09 Jul 2017 KONG MENG SIN (Defendant)Won	09 Jul 2017	KONG MENG SIN (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Mykytowych v V I P Hotel: Negligence Claim for Hotel Lobby Slip and Fall Resulting in Knee Fracture and Alleged Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 18 May 2015 Pamela Jane Mykytowych (Plaintiff)Partial	18 May 2015	Pamela Jane Mykytowych (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $9,005.115 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).