Chew Kiat Jinn

Chew Kiat Jinn is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Allotment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chew Kiat Jinn has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chew Kiat Jinn has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Minority Oppression & Share Dilution(Sep 2010) Shen Yixuan v Maxz Universal: Share Allotment Dispute under Companies Act s 76(1)(a)(Oct 2009) Chiam Heng Luan v Chiam Heng Hsien: Proprietary Estoppel & Termination of Leases(Aug 2007)
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	The One Suites Pte Ltd v Pacific Motor Credit: Rescission of Property Purchase Due to HDB Approval Refusal(Sep 2014)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	Lion City Holdings v Jumabhoy Asad: Amendment of Writ and Limitation Defence in Fiduciary Duty Claim(Jun 2004)
Quahe Woo and Palmer LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	The One Suites Pte Ltd v Pacific Motor Credit: Property Sale, HDB Approval & Contract Rescission(Apr 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chew Kiat Jinn's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.9
Complex Cases: 4 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	27.3 parties avg	7.3	33%
Won	49.4 parties avg	9.4	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2007	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2009	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2010	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chew Kiat Jinn's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,680,000.00	560,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The One Suites Pte Ltd v Pacific Motor Credit: Property Sale, HDB Approval & Contract Rescission 08 Apr 2015 The One Suites Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	08 Apr 2015	The One Suites Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs; Appellant entitled to recover $1.68m deposit. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	The One Suites Pte Ltd v Pacific Motor Credit: Rescission of Property Purchase Due to HDB Approval Refusal 16 Sep 2014 The One Suites Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Purchaser)Lost	16 Sep 2014	The One Suites Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Purchaser): Claim DismissedThe Purchaser's claim for the refund of the deposit was dismissed.
3	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Minority Oppression & Share Dilution 07 Sep 2010 Cairnhill Treasure Investment (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Sep 2010	Cairnhill Treasure Investment (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Buy-out of plaintiffs’ shares orderedBuy-out of plaintiffs’ shares ordered at the higher of their value immediately prior to the First Rights Issue or the current value. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Shen Yixuan v Maxz Universal: Share Allotment Dispute under Companies Act s 76(1)(a) 21 Oct 2009 Treasure Resort Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	21 Oct 2009	Treasure Resort Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claims struck outThe plaintiff’s claims in respect to the breach of section 76(1)(a) and the cancellation of the share allotment were struck out.
5	Chiam Heng Luan v Chiam Heng Hsien: Proprietary Estoppel & Termination of Leases 20 Aug 2007 Teo Cheng Woon (Plaintiff)Won	20 Aug 2007	Teo Cheng Woon (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedOrder for sale of property with vacant possession granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Lion City Holdings v Jumabhoy Asad: Amendment of Writ and Limitation Defence in Fiduciary Duty Claim 15 Jun 2004 Jumabhoy Asad (Defendant)Won	15 Jun 2004	Jumabhoy Asad (Defendant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal against the amendment of the writ was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.