Cheong Aik Chye

Cheong Aik Chye is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 7.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated expertise across 54 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private nuisance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Controlled Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Kidnapping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of duty of fidelity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Execution of Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duties of Court Bailiffs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Excessive Seizure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liability of Execution Creditor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Competition	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Face Rage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Cheong Aik Chye has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Cheong Aik Chye has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 12 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
A C Cheong & Co.	12 cases	86% of cases	PP v Ng Peng Chong: Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, and the Misuse of Drugs Act(Jul 2017) Public Prosecutor v Ng Peng Chong: Drug Trafficking - Joint Possession of Diamorphine(May 2017) Mona Computer Systems v Singaravelu Murugan: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Account of Profits(Mar 2014)
A C Cheong and Co	1 cases	7% of cases	PP v Chaw Aiang Wah: Culpable Homicide and Deterrent Sentencing for 'Face Rage' Incident(Aug 2004)
Lim & Gopalan	1 cases	7% of cases	Epolar System v Lee Hock Chuan: Nuisance Claim for Fire Damage Dismissed(Mar 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cheong Aik Chye's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.9
Complex Cases: 2 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	7%
Lost	94.7 parties avg	4.7	64%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	7%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	21%
Won	114.0 parties avg	14.0	7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2010	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cheong Aik Chye's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(7%)	7%
Lost	9(60%)	60%
Neutral	1(7%)	7%
Partial	3(20%)	20%
Won	1(7%)	7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	76,924.67	19,231.174 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Ng Peng Chong: Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, and the Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Jul 2017 Ng Peng Chong (Defendant)Lost	05 Jul 2017	Ng Peng Chong (Defendant): Imprisonment for 25 yearsSentenced to 20 years for the First charge and 5 years for the Third charge, to run consecutively.
2	Public Prosecutor v Ng Peng Chong: Drug Trafficking - Joint Possession of Diamorphine 02 May 2017 Ng Peng Chong (Defendant)Lost	02 May 2017	Ng Peng Chong (Defendant): Conviction on amended chargeConvicted on the amended charge of joint possession of 10.17g of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
3	Mona Computer Systems v Singaravelu Murugan: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Account of Profits 19 Mar 2014 Singaravelu Murugan (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	19 Mar 2014	Singaravelu Murugan (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedDefendant's appeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Mona Computer Systems v Singaravelu: Account of Profits for Breach of Fiduciary Duty 26 Nov 2013 Singaravelu Murugan (Respondent)Partial	26 Nov 2013	Singaravelu Murugan (Respondent): Partial LossOrdered to account for $316,065.37 in commissions. Allowed to retain director's fees. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	South East Enterprises v Hean Nerng: Excessive Seizure, Bailiff Liability & Execution Creditor Responsibility 14 Mar 2013 SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (Appellant)Partial	14 Mar 2013	SOUTH EAST ENTERPRISES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed against the First Respondent. The First Respondent shall be liable to the Appellant for the sum of $96,448.12 less $19,523.45 (this sum is the balance sale proceeds which was refunded to the Appellant). Interest on this sum fixed at 3% per annum from the date of the filing of these proceedings to the date of this judgment of the due amount is to be paid to the Appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Mona Computer Systems v Chandran Meenakumari: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Diversion of Business Opportunities 15 Nov 2012 Singaravelu Murugan (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	15 Nov 2012	Singaravelu Murugan (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed regarding accounting for commission of $316,065.37; had to account for director's fees of $48,125 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Chan Heng Kong v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Abetment, and Mens Rea 05 Mar 2012 Chan Heng Kong (Appellant)Lost	05 Mar 2012	Chan Heng Kong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedChan Heng Kong's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
8	Public Prosecutor v Wang Wenfeng: Murder, Armed Robbery, Penal Code 19 Sep 2011 Wang Wenfeng (Defendant)Lost	19 Sep 2011	Wang Wenfeng (Defendant): GuiltyAccused found guilty of murder and sentenced to capital punishment.
9	Mohamed Amin v Lim Choon Thye: Collective Sale Approval & Costs Dispute 17 Nov 2010 Lim Choon Thye and others (Defendant)Neutral	17 Nov 2010	Lim Choon Thye and others (Defendant): No order as to costsThe court determined that no order as to costs should be made in Originating Summons 17 of 2008.
10	Mona Computer Systems v Chandran Meenakumari: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Diversion of Business Opportunities 15 Sep 2010 Singaravelu Murugan (Defendant)Lost	15 Sep 2010	Singaravelu Murugan (Defendant): Judgment AgainstFound liable for breach of fiduciary duty and ordered to account for profits.
11	Mohamed Amin v Lim Choon Thye: Interpretation of 'Proceeds of Sale' under Land Titles (Strata) Act for En Bloc Sale 02 Mar 2009 Ee Ah Choo (Defendant)Lost	02 Mar 2009	Ee Ah Choo (Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and the STB Application remitted back to the Board for a continuation of the Board’s proceedings.
12	Public Prosecutor v Lee Kwee Siong: Drug Trafficking & Knowledge of Controlled Drugs 20 Jul 2008 Lee Siaw Foo (Defendant)Lost	20 Jul 2008	Lee Siaw Foo (Defendant): ConvictedLee Siaw Foo was convicted on his charges and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
13	PP v Chaw Aiang Wah: Culpable Homicide and Deterrent Sentencing for 'Face Rage' Incident 04 Aug 2004 Chaw Aiang Wah (Defendant)Lost	04 Aug 2004	Chaw Aiang Wah (Defendant): Conviction and SentencingThe accused was convicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment with 12 strokes of the cane. The custodial sentence shall be backdated to commence on 28 October 2003, being the date Chaw was taken into custody.
14	Epolar System v Lee Hock Chuan: Nuisance Claim for Fire Damage Dismissed 20 Mar 2003 Lee Chen Chon (Respondent)Won	20 Mar 2003	Lee Chen Chon (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe respondent successfully defended the appeal.