Charlene Wee Swee Ting

Charlene Wee Swee Ting is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and international commercial arbitration. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 39% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated expertise across 81 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	8 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moratoria	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Remuneration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unauthorised person acting as advocate or solicitor	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of fact in loans of money	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inconsistent positions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architects, Engineers and Surveyors	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Subcontracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Convenience Class	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proportionality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reasonableness	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Direct payments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Charlene Wee Swee Ting has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Charlene Wee Swee Ting has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Prolegis LLC	10 cases	56% of cases	Udenna Corp v Pertamina: Setting Aside Service of Process in International Arbitration Enforcement(Nov 2024) AI MTBL SPV v MTBL Global Fund: Breach of Contract & Frustration in Investment Redemption(Oct 2024) MCST No 4099 v KTP Consultants: Limitation Act & Negligence in Cladding Installation(Oct 2024)
Salem Ibrahim LLC	5 cases	28% of cases	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Legal Profession Act & Remuneration for Unauthorised Legal Services(Feb 2022) Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Application for Transfer of Appeal on Legal Profession Act Interpretation(Jan 2022) Chen Yun Hian Christopher v BHNV Online Ltd: Conflict of Laws & Jurisdiction in Fraud Claim(Dec 2020)
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	3 cases	17% of cases	Ajeet Gobindram Vaswani v Salvatore Gregory Takoushian: Privilege & Waiver of Legal Advice(Apr 2023) Re Zipmex Pte Ltd: Sanction of Schemes of Arrangement & Administrative Convenience Class in Cryptocurrency Platform Insolvency(Apr 2023) Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute(Dec 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Charlene Wee Swee Ting's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 7 (39%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	94.6 parties avg	4.6	50%
Unknown	18.0 parties avg	8.0	6%
Won	83.8 parties avg	3.8	44%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2024	104.2 parties avg	4.2

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Charlene Wee Swee Ting's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(50%)	50%
Unknown	1(6%)	6%
Won	8(44%)	44%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	614,880.41	61,488.0410 cases	10
USD	16,638,540.66	8,319,270.332 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	10 37	Lost: 3 cases (30.0%) Won: 7 cases (70.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Udenna Corp v Pertamina: Setting Aside Service of Process in International Arbitration Enforcement 26 Nov 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant, Claimant)Won	26 Nov 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Respondent, Applicant, Claimant): Costs awardedPIMD was awarded costs of USD 5,000, payable by Udenna. The currency is assumed to be USD as it was requested by PIMD.
2	AI MTBL SPV v MTBL Global Fund: Breach of Contract & Frustration in Investment Redemption 21 Oct 2024 China Capital Impetus Asset Management (Defendant)Lost	21 Oct 2024	China Capital Impetus Asset Management (Defendant): Damages AwardedDamages awarded against the Fund Manager in the amount of US$16,633,540.66, plus interest. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the case concerns international investments.
3	MCST No 4099 v KTP Consultants: Limitation Act & Negligence in Cladding Installation 08 Oct 2024 KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	08 Oct 2024	KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Striking Out Set AsideStriking out of KTP as a party was set aside, and the MCST was awarded costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Setting Aside Service of Process in SICC Arbitration Enforcement 26 Sep 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	26 Sep 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application grantedApplication to set aside service of originating application dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD for Singapore.
5	Pertamina v Phoenix Petroleum: Costs Dispute in Anti-Suit Injunction & Enforcement of Arbitration Award 05 Sep 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	05 Sep 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Costs awardedCosts awarded in the sum of $319,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Pertamina v. Phoenix: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Scope. Dispute over unpaid petroleum product shipments. 27 Jun 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant)Won	27 Jun 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant, Applicant): Application GrantedRelief sought in Originating Application No 1 of 2024 granted. Costs of OA 1 and OA 23 including SUM 21 to be paid by Phoenix, such costs to be assessed by the court unless otherwise agreed by the parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Pertamina v P-H-O-E-N-I-X: Costs for Contempt of Court in Arbitration Enforcement 27 Jun 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	27 Jun 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Costs awardedCosts of SUM 8 awarded in the sum of $205,880.41 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Este Villa MCST v TPS Construction: Limitation Act & Striking Out in Construction Defect Case 09 Jun 2024 KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant)Won	09 Jun 2024	KTP Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartKTP's appeal against the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar to dismiss KTP’s application in HC/SUM 2609/2023 (“SUM 2609”) to strike out the plaintiff’s case against KTP in HC/S 143/2022 (the “Suit”) was allowed in part. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Pertamina v P-H-O-E-N-I-X: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 25 Apr 2024 Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	25 Apr 2024	Pertamina International Marketing & Distribution Pte Ltd (Claimant): Applications in Summons 8 dismissed; orders in ORC 5 to standApplications in Summons 8 dismissed; orders in ORC 5 to stand. No monetary amount awarded.
10	Re Zipmex Co Ltd: Extension of Moratoria under Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 10 Jan 2024 PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant)Lost	10 Jan 2024	PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for extension of moratorium dismissed.
11	Ajeet Gobindram Vaswani v Salvatore Gregory Takoushian: Privilege & Waiver of Legal Advice 18 Apr 2023 Kelvin Ng Kheng Choo (Defendant)	18 Apr 2023	Kelvin Ng Kheng Choo (Defendant): -
12	Re Zipmex Pte Ltd: Sanction of Schemes of Arrangement & Administrative Convenience Class in Cryptocurrency Platform Insolvency 05 Apr 2023 PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant)Won	05 Apr 2023	PT Zipmex Exchange Indonesia (Applicant): Application AllowedApplication for extension of time of moratoria was allowed.
13	Ten-League v Precise Development: Direct Payment Arrangement & Construction Subcontracts Dispute 22 Dec 2022 Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Dec 2022	Ten-League Corporations Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed.
14	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Legal Profession Act & Remuneration for Unauthorised Legal Services 08 Feb 2022 Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	08 Feb 2022	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedChoo is to pay costs of $45,000 to Phua inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred v Phua Swee Khiang: Application for Transfer of Appeal on Legal Profession Act Interpretation 24 Jan 2022 Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred (Applicant)Lost	24 Jan 2022	Choo Cheng Tong Wilfred (Applicant): Application dismissedThe application for the transfer of the appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
16	Chen Yun Hian Christopher v BHNV Online Ltd: Conflict of Laws & Jurisdiction in Fraud Claim 30 Dec 2020 Christopher Yun Hian Chen (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Dec 2020	Christopher Yun Hian Chen (Plaintiff): Applications DismissedPlaintiff's claims dismissed; ordered to pay costs to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	Mulacek v Civelli: Appeal on Forum Non Conveniens and Anti-Suit Injunction in Breach of Contract and Fiduciary Duty Claims 14 Jun 2020 Philippe Emanuel Mulacek (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	14 Jun 2020	Philippe Emanuel Mulacek (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and disbursements fixed at a global figure of $45,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Civelli v. Mulacek: Forum Non Conveniens & Anti-Suit Injunction in Loan Dispute 13 Aug 2019 Philippe Emanuel Mulacek (Defendant)Lost	13 Aug 2019	Philippe Emanuel Mulacek (Defendant): Application for anti-suit injunction dismissedMr Mulacek’s application for an anti-suit injunction to restrain the Texas proceedings is dismissed.