Benny Jude Philomen

Benny Jude Philomen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Originating processes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Benny Jude Philomen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Benny Jude Philomen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP	3 cases	75% of cases	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Stay of Proceedings & Validity of EGMs(Jul 2020) Taylor v Sinfeng Marine: Leave to Appeal Disclosure Orders Under Companies Act(Oct 2019) Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Fiduciary Duty & Rebates(Dec 2010)
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	1 cases	25% of cases	Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Contract Claims(Jan 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Benny Jude Philomen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.3
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	27.5 parties avg	7.5	50%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Won	210.0 parties avg	10.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	210.0 parties avg	10.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Benny Jude Philomen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,477,474.00	492,491.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lin Jianwei v Tung Yu-Lien Margaret: Stay of Proceedings & Validity of EGMs 22 Jul 2020 Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	22 Jul 2020	Raffles Town Club Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralThe interests of the second defendant in OS 1446 are also not compromised.
2	Taylor v Sinfeng Marine: Leave to Appeal Disclosure Orders Under Companies Act 17 Oct 2019 Costank (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Oct 2019	Costank (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Orders for disclosure granted against the defendantOrders for disclosure granted against the defendant. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Fiduciary Duty & Rebates 01 Dec 2010 Starship Agencies Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Lost	01 Dec 2010	Starship Agencies Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed regarding the Rebates issue. The Fourth Respondent was obliged to account to the Appellants the sum of RM1,477,474. Converted to SGD using the exchange rate on the date of the judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Contract Claims 10 Jan 2010 Rajathurai Suppiah (Defendant)Won	10 Jan 2010	Rajathurai Suppiah (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantPlaintiffs' claims against the defendant dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.