Anand Nalachandran

Anand Nalachandran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 47 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 9.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated expertise across 85 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	44 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 44 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	40 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 40 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	31 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 31 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	19 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Murder	13 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Theft	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abduction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trafficking in controlled drugs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Complicity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Provocation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guardianship of Infants Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Attempted culpable homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Kidnapping	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forensic Science	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prostitution Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extortion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
General Deterrence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Diplomatic Relations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sodomy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Circumstantial Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment of Trafficking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alibi	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Poisoning	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness of statement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rioting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Abuse	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences Relating to Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand Nalachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anand Nalachandran has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 28 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	28 cases	60% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Kwong Kok Hing: Sentencing for Attempted Culpable Homicide with Hurt(May 2007) Public Prosecutor v Lim Ah Liang: Culpable Homicide and Mental Illness(Mar 2007) PP v Chee Cheong Hin Constance: Sentencing for Kidnapping and Culpable Homicide by Mentally Disordered Offender(Apr 2006)
TSMP Law Corporation	8 cases	17% of cases	Public Prosecutor v CAD: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offender(Nov 2019) Public Prosecutor v Sulaiman bin Jumari: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2019) Singapore Medical Council v Dr Mohd Syamsul Alam Bin Ismail: Appeal for Professional Misconduct Suspension(Mar 2019)
Braddell Brothers LLP	4 cases	9% of cases	PP v Kho Jabing: Discretionary Death Penalty, Murder, Blatant Disregard for Human Life(Jan 2015) Public Prosecutor v Kho Jabing: Re-sentencing for Murder under Penal Code s 300(c)(Nov 2013) Sim Choon Wee Kenny v Public Prosecutor: Appeals on Custodial Sentence for Offenses Involving Underage Prostitute(Sep 2013)
ATMD Bird & Bird LLP	2 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Luo Faming: Culpable Homicide Sentencing(Nov 2011) Aam Usup v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Theft as Domestic Worker(Oct 2009)
Forte Law LLC	2 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohammad Rosli: Murder, Provocation, and Penal Code Interpretation(Nov 2021) Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor: Admissibility of Statements under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2020)
Harry Elias & Partners	1 cases	2% of cases	Vignes v PP: Trafficking, Lack of Knowledge & Abetment of Drug Trafficking(Jan 2003)
Harry Elias and Partners	1 cases	2% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Vijayakumar: Murder, Private Defence & Penal Code Exceptions(Nov 2005)
AC	1 cases	2% of cases	PP v Tan Siew Lam: Trafficking of Morphine & Knowledge of Drug Possession under Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anand Nalachandran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	412.2 parties avg	2.2	87%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	2%
Unknown	12.0 parties avg	2.0	2%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	9%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2001	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2002	62.2 parties avg	2.2
2003	62.3 parties avg	2.3
2004	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2005	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2006	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anand Nalachandran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	41(87%)	87%
Partial	1(2%)	2%
Unknown	1(2%)	2%
Won	4(9%)	9%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	25,000.00	6,250.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	5 41	Lost: 4 cases (80.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (20.0%)
2002	6 6	Lost: 6 cases (100.0%)
2003	6 51	Lost: 5 cases (83.3%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2004	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2005	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2006	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 47 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Mohammad Rosli: Murder, Provocation, and Penal Code Interpretation 08 Nov 2021 Mohammad Rosli bin Abdul Rahim (Defense)Lost	08 Nov 2021	Mohammad Rosli bin Abdul Rahim (Defense): ConvictionThe accused was convicted on the charge of murder under s 300(c) of the Penal Code.
2	Sulaiman bin Jumari v Public Prosecutor: Admissibility of Statements under the Misuse of Drugs Act 01 Dec 2020 Sulaiman bin Jumari (Appellant)Lost	01 Dec 2020	Sulaiman bin Jumari (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
3	Public Prosecutor v CAD: Culpable Homicide & Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offender 03 Nov 2019 CAD (Defendant)Lost	03 Nov 2019	CAD (Defendant): Sentence of seven years’ imprisonmentAccused sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment.
4	Public Prosecutor v Sulaiman bin Jumari: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Sep 2019 Sulaiman bin Jumari (Defendant)Lost	08 Sep 2019	Sulaiman bin Jumari (Defendant): ConvictionAccused convicted of possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking and sentenced to death.
5	Singapore Medical Council v Dr Mohd Syamsul Alam Bin Ismail: Appeal for Professional Misconduct Suspension 05 Mar 2019 Singapore Medical Council (Appellant)Won	05 Mar 2019	Singapore Medical Council (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the term of suspension was increased from three months' suspension to two years and six months' suspension. The Respondent is to bear the costs of the SMC, which was fixed in the aggregate sum of $25,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Public Prosecutor v Chia Kee Chen: Murder, Common Intention, and Sentencing 26 Jun 2018 Chia Kee Chen (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	26 Jun 2018	Chia Kee Chen (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedChia Kee Chen's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
7	Pua Hung Jaan Jeffrey Nguyen v Public Prosecutor: Drink Driving Appeal 03 Oct 2017 Pua Hung Jaan Jeffrey Nguyen (Appellant)Won	03 Oct 2017	Pua Hung Jaan Jeffrey Nguyen (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the sentence of one week's imprisonment was allowed and substituted with the maximum fine of $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	PP v Pham Duyen Quyen: Importation of Methamphetamine & Misuse of Drugs Act 16 Oct 2016 Pham Duyen Quyen (Defendant)Lost	16 Oct 2016	Pham Duyen Quyen (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe defendant was found guilty of importing a Class A controlled drug and sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment.
9	PP v Lim Choon Beng: Rape, Aggravated Outrage of Modesty & Penile-Oral Penetration on Public Roads 21 Sep 2016 Lim Choon Beng (Defendant)Lost	21 Sep 2016	Lim Choon Beng (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedAccused sentenced to 16 years, 10 months and 2 weeks’ imprisonment, and 22 strokes of the cane.
10	Public Prosecutor v BAC: Culpable Homicide and Mental Depression in Child's Death 30 Mar 2016 BAC (Defendant)Lost	30 Mar 2016	BAC (Defendant): Sentence of 5 years imprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment with effect from 13 September 2014.
11	PP v Kho Jabing: Discretionary Death Penalty, Murder, Blatant Disregard for Human Life 13 Jan 2015 Kho Jabing (Respondent)Lost	13 Jan 2015	Kho Jabing (Respondent): Death Penalty ImposedThe Respondent's sentence was changed from life imprisonment and caning to the death penalty.
12	Public Prosecutor v Kho Jabing: Re-sentencing for Murder under Penal Code s 300(c) 17 Nov 2013 Kho Jabing (Defendant)Partial	17 Nov 2013	Kho Jabing (Defendant): Re-sentenced to life imprisonment and caningThe convicted person was re-sentenced to life imprisonment with effect from the date of his arrest (26 February 2008) and to receive 24 strokes of the cane.
13	Sim Choon Wee Kenny v Public Prosecutor: Appeals on Custodial Sentence for Offenses Involving Underage Prostitute 19 Sep 2013 Sim Choon Wee Kenny (Appellant)Lost	19 Sep 2013	Sim Choon Wee Kenny (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed.
14	Public Prosecutor v Luo Faming: Culpable Homicide Sentencing 01 Nov 2011 Luo Faming (Defendant)Lost	01 Nov 2011	Luo Faming (Defendant): Sentenced to ImprisonmentSentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment for culpable homicide and 6 years’ imprisonment for a second charge, to run consecutively, for a total of 24 years’ imprisonment.
15	Public Prosecutor v Ellarry bin Puling: Joint Charge of Murder and Common Intention 25 Sep 2011 Fabian Adiu Edwin (Defendant)Lost	25 Sep 2011	Fabian Adiu Edwin (Defendant): LostFound guilty of murder under Section 300(c) of the Penal Code and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
16	Aam Usup v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Theft as Domestic Worker 05 Oct 2009 Aam Usup (Appellant)Lost	05 Oct 2009	Aam Usup (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
17	Public Prosecutor v Kwong Kok Hing: Sentencing for Attempted Culpable Homicide with Hurt 29 May 2007 Kwong Kok Hing (Defendant)Lost	29 May 2007	Kwong Kok Hing (Defendant): Accused sentenced to one year's imprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to one year's imprisonment.
18	Public Prosecutor v Lim Ah Liang: Culpable Homicide and Mental Illness 15 Mar 2007 Lim Ah Liang (Defendant)Lost	15 Mar 2007	Lim Ah Liang (Defendant): Life ImprisonmentThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment.
19	PP v Chee Cheong Hin Constance: Sentencing for Kidnapping and Culpable Homicide by Mentally Disordered Offender 06 Apr 2006 Chee Cheong Hin Constance (Defendant)Lost	06 Apr 2006	Chee Cheong Hin Constance (Defendant): LostAccused sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment for culpable homicide and 3 years' imprisonment for kidnapping, to run consecutively. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Took Leng How v PP: Diminished Responsibility & Adverse Inferences in Murder Conviction Appeal 24 Jan 2006 Took Leng How (Appellant)Lost	24 Jan 2006	Took Leng How (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed.
21	PP v Chee Cheong Hin Constance: Culpable Homicide & Kidnapping - Child's Death 23 Jan 2006 Chee Cheong Hin Constance (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2006	Chee Cheong Hin Constance (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted of kidnapping and culpable homicide.
22	Public Prosecutor v Vijayakumar: Murder, Private Defence & Penal Code Exceptions 29 Nov 2005 Vijayakumar s/o Veeriah (Defendant)Lost	29 Nov 2005	Vijayakumar s/o Veeriah (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
23	PP v Took Leng How: Murder, Diminished Responsibility & Schizophrenia 25 Aug 2005 Took Leng How (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2005	Took Leng How (Defendant): Guilty as chargedAccused found guilty as charged and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
24	Public Prosecutor v Vanmaichelvan: Drug Trafficking Sentence Appeal 21 Apr 2005 Vanmaichelvan s/o Barsathi (Appellant)Lost	21 Apr 2005	Vanmaichelvan s/o Barsathi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the sentence of 26 years’ imprisonment with 15 strokes of the cane was dismissed.
25	Chua Tian Bok Timothy v Public Prosecutor: Road Rage, Compounding Offences & Public Interest 15 Sep 2004 Chua Tian Bok Timothy (Petitioner)Lost	15 Sep 2004	Chua Tian Bok Timothy (Petitioner): Petition DismissedThe petition for revision was dismissed, and the case was remitted to the lower court for trial.
26	PP v Tan Ping Koon & Chua Ser Lien: Kidnapping for Ransom - Sentencing 08 Sep 2004 Tan Ping Koon (Defendant)Lost	08 Sep 2004	Tan Ping Koon (Defendant): Imprisonment for life and caningSentenced to imprisonment for life and three strokes of the cane.
27	Public Prosecutor v Ng Kwang Lim: Culpable Homicide and Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offender 28 Apr 2004 Ng Kwang Lim (Defendant)Lost	28 Apr 2004	Ng Kwang Lim (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.
28	Public Prosecutor v AA: Sentencing for Sodomy Offences Involving Minors 19 Jan 2004 AA (Defendant)Lost	19 Jan 2004	AA (Defendant): Defendant sentencedAccused sentenced to a total of three years and nine months imprisonment.
29	Soosainathan v PP: Murder Conviction Upheld Despite Inconsistencies in Evidence 03 Nov 2003 Soosainathan s/o Dass Saminathan (Appellant)Lost	03 Nov 2003	Soosainathan s/o Dass Saminathan (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the conviction for murder was dismissed.
30	Han Yung Ting v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal Dismissed 29 Oct 2003 Han Yung Ting (Appellant)Lost	29 Oct 2003	Han Yung Ting (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed.
31	Public Prosecutor v Dhanabalan: Trafficking of Controlled Drugs 20 Aug 2003 Dhanabalan s/o A Gopalkrishnan (Defense)Lost	20 Aug 2003	Dhanabalan s/o A Gopalkrishnan (Defense): Conviction and SentencingAccused sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for each of the two charges as well as 15 strokes of the cane for each charge. The court ordered the terms of imprisonment to be served concurrently and restricted the maximum number of strokes to 24.
32	Tan Chun Seng v Public Prosecutor: Sudden Fight Defence in Culpable Homicide 05 Jun 2003 Tan Chun Seng (Appellant)Won	05 Jun 2003	Tan Chun Seng (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
33	PP v Fazely: Complicity, Common Intention & Unlawful Assembly in Murder & Rioting 16 Mar 2003 Khairul Famy bin Mohd Samsudin (Respondent)Lost	16 Mar 2003	Khairul Famy bin Mohd Samsudin (Respondent): Convicted of causing grievous hurtAcquitted of murder but convicted of causing grievous hurt under s 325, read with s 149, of the Penal Code.
34	Vignes v PP: Trafficking, Lack of Knowledge & Abetment of Drug Trafficking 21 Jan 2003 Vignes s/o Mourthi (Appellant)Lost	21 Jan 2003	Vignes s/o Mourthi (Appellant): Appeal DismissedVignes's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
35	Public Prosecutor v Quek Loo Ming: Sentencing Appeal for Culpable Homicide and Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt 07 Nov 2002 Quek Loo Ming (Respondent)Lost	07 Nov 2002	Quek Loo Ming (Respondent): Sentence IncreasedThe respondent's sentence was increased to 10 years imprisonment for the first charge and 5 years for the second charge, to run consecutively.
36	Public Prosecutor v Saminathan: Murder and Robbery Case 31 Oct 2002 Saminathan s/o Subramaniam (Defendant)Lost	31 Oct 2002	Saminathan s/o Subramaniam (Defendant): Imprisonment for life and caningSentenced to imprisonment for life and 6 strokes of the cane for manslaughter, and 5 years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for robbery. Terms to run concurrently.
37	Public Prosecutor v Salehudden bin Ibrahim: Culpable Homicide and Mitigation 13 Aug 2002 Salehudden bin Ibrahim (Defense)Lost	13 Aug 2002	Salehudden bin Ibrahim (Defense): ConvictedAccused sentenced to eight years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.
38	Public Prosecutor v Quek Loo Ming: Culpable Homicide and Poisoning Case 04 Aug 2002 Quek Loo Ming (Defendant)Lost	04 Aug 2002	Quek Loo Ming (Defendant): ImprisonmentSentenced to 9 years imprisonment for the first charge and 3 years imprisonment for the second charge, to run concurrently.
39	PP v Fazely bin Rahmat: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object, and Murder Charge 07 Jul 2002 Khairul Famy bin Mohd Samsudin (Defendant)Lost	07 Jul 2002	Khairul Famy bin Mohd Samsudin (Defendant): Guilty of RiotingFound guilty of rioting under Section 147 of the Penal Code and sentenced to five years imprisonment and twelve strokes of the cane. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
40	Ler Wee Teang Anthony v PP: Abetment of Murder & Appellate Review of Factual Findings 18 Apr 2002 Ler Wee Teang Anthony (Appellant)Lost	18 Apr 2002	Ler Wee Teang Anthony (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence for abetting murder was dismissed.
41	Public Prosecutor v Anthony Ler & Z: Abetment to Murder & Murder under Penal Code 04 Dec 2001 Anthony Ler Wee Teang (Defendant)Lost	04 Dec 2001	Anthony Ler Wee Teang (Defendant): Guilty of Abetment to MurderFound guilty of abetting Z to commit murder and sentenced to death.
42	Public Prosecutor v Ong Ker Seng: Criminal Law, Singapore High Court 11 Sep 2001 Ong Ker Seng (Respondent, Appellant)	11 Sep 2001	Ong Ker Seng (Respondent, Appellant): -
43	Public Prosecutor v Ong Ker Seng: Undischarged Bankrupt's Loan & Non-Disclosure 11 Sep 2001 Ong Ker Seng (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	11 Sep 2001	Ong Ker Seng (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissedThe respondent's appeal against conviction was dismissed. The appeal against sentence was allowed.
44	Ashok Kumar Giri v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis and Statutory Presumptions 02 Sep 2001 Ashok Kumar Giri (Appellant)Lost	02 Sep 2001	Ashok Kumar Giri (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
45	Ramis a/l Muniandy v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis & Proof of Possession under Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Aug 2001 Ramis a/l Muniandy (Appellant)Lost	02 Aug 2001	Ramis a/l Muniandy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
46	Public Prosecutor v S Bin N: Rape Charges Dismissed Due to Inconsistent Testimony 19 Oct 2000 S Bin N (Defendant)Won	19 Oct 2000	S Bin N (Defendant): Accused acquittedThe accused was acquitted of all charges.
47	PP v Tan Siew Lam: Trafficking of Morphine & Knowledge of Drug Possession under Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Aug 2000 Anand Naidu a/l Raman (Defendant)Lost	03 Aug 2000	Anand Naidu a/l Raman (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe 2nd Accused was found guilty as charged and convicted him.