Anand Kumar

Anand Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in prevention of corruption act and civil practice. Their track record shows a 38.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Anand Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and agency law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	7 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Total failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unless Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Computation of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bribes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent unless order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Expert Determination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Anand Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Anand Kumar has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Frontier Law Corporation	3 cases	38% of cases	Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Recovery of Entrusted Funds in Property Purchase(Jul 2009) Downeredi Works v Holcim: Interpretation of Contractual Terms and Jurisdiction of High Court(Nov 2008) Citiraya Technology v Centillion Environment: Claim for Refund Due to Failure of Consideration(Oct 2008)
Sadique Marican & Z M Amin	2 cases	25% of cases	Leong Wai Kay v Carrefour Singapore: Recovery of Bribes Under Prevention of Corruption Act(Apr 2007) Carrefour Singapore v Leong Wai Kay: Recovery of Bribes under Prevention of Corruption Act(Sep 2006)
B. Rao K.S. Rajah	1 cases	13% of cases	Chen Qingrui v Phua Geok Leng: Negligence Claim for Pedestrian Injury(Mar 2001)
Tan Lee and Partners	1 cases	13% of cases	Wellmix Organics v Lau Yu Man: Consent Unless Orders & Contractual Mistake(Jan 2006)
Sadique Marican and Z M Amin	1 cases	13% of cases	Evergreat Construction v Presscrete Engineering: Expert Determination & Prevention Principle in Construction Dispute(Dec 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anand Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	38%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	38%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anand Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(13%)	13%
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Partial	1(13%)	13%
Won	3(38%)	38%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	996,200.00	199,240.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohamed Nizam v Sadique Marican: Recovery of Entrusted Funds in Property Purchase 09 Jul 2009 Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	09 Jul 2009	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; summary judgment against the first and second defendants for $380,600 with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Downeredi Works v Holcim: Interpretation of Contractual Terms and Jurisdiction of High Court 10 Nov 2008 Downeredi Works Pte Ltd (formerly known as Works Infrastructure Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Nov 2008	Downeredi Works Pte Ltd (formerly known as Works Infrastructure Pte Ltd) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs of $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be agreed or taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Citiraya Technology v Centillion Environment: Claim for Refund Due to Failure of Consideration 21 Oct 2008 Citiraya Technology Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	21 Oct 2008	Citiraya Technology Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for a refund of $2,000,000 was dismissed.
4	Leong Wai Kay v Carrefour Singapore: Recovery of Bribes Under Prevention of Corruption Act 29 Apr 2007 Carrefour Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	29 Apr 2007	Carrefour Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the respondent to recover $292,800, the amount of gratification received by the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Carrefour Singapore v Leong Wai Kay: Recovery of Bribes under Prevention of Corruption Act 05 Sep 2006 Carrefour Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	05 Sep 2006	Carrefour Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and final judgment entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $292,800 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Wellmix Organics v Lau Yu Man: Consent Unless Orders & Contractual Mistake 25 Jan 2006 Lau Yu Man (Defendant, Appellant)Won	25 Jan 2006	Lau Yu Man (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; no order as to costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Evergreat Construction v Presscrete Engineering: Expert Determination & Prevention Principle in Construction Dispute 07 Dec 2005 Evergreat Construction Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Dec 2005	Evergreat Construction Co Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to set aside award dismissedThe plaintiff's application to set aside the independent assessor's award was dismissed by the court.
8	Chen Qingrui v Phua Geok Leng: Negligence Claim for Pedestrian Injury 29 Mar 2001 Phua Geok Leng (Defendant)Partial	29 Mar 2001	Phua Geok Leng (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar. Contributory negligence found; Plaintiff equally responsible for the accident. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.