A Thamilselvan

A Thamilselvan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in proprietary estoppel and real estate. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

A Thamilselvan has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Housing Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
HDB Flats	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture of Deposit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	A Thamilselvan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

A Thamilselvan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Subra TT Law LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	Nithia v Buthmanaban: Proprietary Estoppel & Purchase Money Resulting Trust Dispute(Oct 2015) Buthmanaban v Krishnavanny: Proprietary Estoppel & Beneficial Interest in Intestate Estate(Feb 2015) Goh Liang Yong Jonah v Heng Kuek Hoy: Forfeiture of Deposits and Rental Payments in Property Sale Dispute(Oct 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of A Thamilselvan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Won	43.6 parties avg	3.6	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of A Thamilselvan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	176,021.43	35,204.295 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nithia v Buthmanaban: Proprietary Estoppel & Purchase Money Resulting Trust Dispute 18 Oct 2015 V NITHIA THE CO-ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PONNUSAMY SIVAPAKIAM, DECEASED (Appellant, Defendant)Won	18 Oct 2015	V NITHIA THE CO-ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PONNUSAMY SIVAPAKIAM, DECEASED (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the part of the Judgment holding that the plaintiff was entitled to relief on the ground of proprietary estoppel was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Buthmanaban v Krishnavanny: Proprietary Estoppel & Beneficial Interest in Intestate Estate 03 Feb 2015 V Nithia (Defendant)Partial	03 Feb 2015	V Nithia (Defendant): Claim partially successful againstThe plaintiff's claim was partially successful against the second defendant, with the plaintiff being awarded 21.43% of the net sale proceeds of the property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Goh Liang Yong Jonah v Heng Kuek Hoy: Forfeiture of Deposits and Rental Payments in Property Sale Dispute 02 Oct 2013 Goh Mei Ching Sandra (Plaintiff)Won	02 Oct 2013	Goh Mei Ching Sandra (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff rental in the sum of $88,000 pursuant to clause 5.1 of the Letter of Indemnity. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Lim Hoe Heng v Poh Choon Kia: Specific Performance of HDB Flat Sale 17 Oct 2012 Goh Siu Mui (Respondent)Partial	17 Oct 2012	Goh Siu Mui (Respondent): Orders upheldSubstantive orders that had been sought and obtained were justified, except for late completion interest.
5	Poh Choon Kia v Lim Hoe Heng: Specific Performance of HDB Flat Sale 25 Apr 2012 Poh Choon Kia's co-plaintiff (Plaintiff)Won	25 Apr 2012	Poh Choon Kia's co-plaintiff (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSpecific performance of the contract for the sale of the flat was ordered. Late completion interest at 10% per annum was ordered to be paid by the first defendant to the plaintiffs with effect from 8 April 2011 until the date of completion. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Chokkanathan Palanimuthu v V Jayaram: Specific Performance of HDB Flat Sale 14 Jun 2011 Chokkanathan Sudha (Plaintiff)Won	14 Jun 2011	Chokkanathan Sudha (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffSummary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff for specific performance. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.