Tan & Au LLP

Tan & Au LLP is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2025. The firm has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and appellate practice. Their track record shows a 4.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 18.2% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and administrative law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	10 cases	15.4% of total caseload	General Practice43.13% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 15.4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	7 cases	10.8% of total caseload	General Practice26.46% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 10.8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	6.2% of total caseload	General Practice36.67% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	4 cases	6.2% of total caseload	General Practice26.36% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	4 cases	6.2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76.11% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6.2% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	3 cases	4.6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81.50% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4.6% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	3.1% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	3.1% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	3.1% of total caseload	General Practice33.33% relevance score	Tan & Au LLP has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Tan & Au LLP has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 12 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Carolyn Tan Beng Hui	12 cases	54.5% of firm's cases	2025 sghc 1(Jan 2025) 2022 sghca 12(Mar 2022)
Au Thye Chuen	10 cases	45.5% of firm's cases	2023 sgca 7(Feb 2023) 2022 sghc 29(Feb 2022)
Carolyn Tan	5 cases	22.7% of firm's cases	2016 sghc 42(Mar 2016) 2014 sghc 157(Aug 2014) 2012 sghc 250(Dec 2012)
Leong De Shun Kevin	5 cases	22.7% of firm's cases	2025 sghc 1(Jan 2025) 2023 sgca 7(Feb 2023)
Tan Beng Hui Carolyn	3 cases	13.6% of firm's cases	2021 sghc 213(Sep 2021) 2021 sghc 99(Apr 2021) 2008 sgca 3(Jan 2008)
Kuoh Hao Teng	2 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2022 sghc 29(Feb 2022) 2021 sghc 213(Sep 2021)
Kevin Leong	2 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2022 sghca 12(Mar 2022) 2022 sghca 10(Mar 2022)
Tony Au Thye Chuen	2 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2017 sghc 152(Jul 2017) 2010 sghc 110(Apr 2010)
Tony Au	2 cases	9.1% of firm's cases	2016 sghc 42(Mar 2016) 2010 sghc 326(Nov 2010)
Carolyn B.H. Tan	1 cases	4.5% of firm's cases	2010 sghc 110(Apr 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan & Au LLP's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 4 (18.2%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	163.2 parties avg	3.2	72.7%
Partial	35.3 parties avg	5.3	13.6%
Neutral	22.0 parties avg	2.0	9.1%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4.5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2012	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	44.2 parties avg	4.2
2019	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan & Au LLP's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	16(72.7%)	72.7%
Partial	3(13.6%)	13.6%
Neutral	2(9.1%)	9.1%
Won	1(4.5%)	4.5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	170000	3617.0215 cases	15

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	011 11	Neutral: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2014	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	01 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	04 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2019	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	03 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2023	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Tan & Au LLP in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Png Hock LengAppellant, Applicant, Plaintiff, Appellant Lost (3)	Appellant, Applicant, Plaintiff, Appellant	3 cases	Lost (3)
Raman DhirAppellant Lost (2)Won (1)	Appellant	3 cases	Lost (2)Won (1)
Ong Wui SwoonDefendant, Appellant, Respondent, Plaintiff Neutral (2)Partial (1)	Defendant, Appellant, Respondent, Plaintiff	3 cases	Neutral (2)Partial (1)
Blenwel Agencies Pte LtdApplicant, Plaintiff, Applicant Lost (2)	Applicant, Plaintiff, Applicant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Lew Huey Jiun, IsabelleClaimant Lost (1)	Claimant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ong Pang LiangClaimant Lost (1)	Claimant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Beng Hui CarolynAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lim Seo LayDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Huah TaiDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan & Au LLPApplicant Partial (1)	Applicant	1 case	Partial (1)
Constance Tan Gek SuanPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Jessie Tan Gek ChooPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
ALVINA KHOO LEA INGDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
LEE KIM WOON MICHAELDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
LIM MUANDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
TOMMY WONG POH CHOY @ WONG PAU CHOUDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Kee Onn Engineering Pte LtdDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Liew Soon Fook MichaelPlaintiff, Appellant Lost (1)	Plaintiff, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Wong Siew Ying Esther @ Gui Mee EngPlaintiff, Appellant Lost (1)	Plaintiff, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Long Say Ting DanielPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 2911Plaintiff, Respondent Lost (1)	Plaintiff, Respondent	1 case	Lost (1)
Piong Michelle LuciaPlaintiff, Appellant Lost (1)	Plaintiff, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)