Palakrishnan & Partners

Palakrishnan & Partners is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2002. The firm has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and family law. Their track record shows a 23.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 23.1% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	14.8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.71% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14.8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	11.1% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	11.1% of total caseload	General Practice32.00% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11.1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	2 cases	7.4% of total caseload	General Practice46.67% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	7.4% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	7.4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88.33% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7.4% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Law	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3.7% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Palakrishnan & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Palakrishnan & Partners has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 4 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
R Palakrishnan	4 cases	30.8% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 196(Jul 2001) 2001 sghc 194(Jul 2001) 2000 sgca 67(Nov 2000)
Malathi Das	4 cases	30.8% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 162(Jul 2002) 2002 sghc 108(May 2002) 2001 sghc 196(Jul 2001)
Palakrishnan SC	3 cases	23.1% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 209(Sep 2002) 2002 sghc 172(Aug 2002) 2002 sghc 162(Jul 2002)
P Balagopal	3 cases	23.1% of firm's cases	2001 sghc 278(Sep 2001) 2000 sghc 223(Oct 2000)
R Thrumurgan	2 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2000 sgca 42(Aug 2000) 2000 sghc 133(Jul 2000)
Suchitra Ragupathy	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 33(Feb 2002)
Palakrishnan	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2000 sgca 42(Aug 2000)
Daniel Koh	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2000 sgca 67(Nov 2000)
M P Kanisan	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2000 sghc 223(Oct 2000)
R Palakrishnan SC	1 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 108(May 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Palakrishnan & Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 3 (23.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.7 parties avg	2.7	46.2%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	23.1%
Partial	22.7 parties avg	2.7	15.4%
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	7.7%
Neutral	119.0 parties avg	19.0	7.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	52.8 parties avg	2.8
2001	35.4 parties avg	5.4
2002	52.9 parties avg	2.9

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Palakrishnan & Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(46.2%)	46.2%
Won	3(23.1%)	23.1%
Partial	2(15.4%)	15.4%
Dismissed	1(7.7%)	7.7%
Neutral	1(7.7%)	7.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	134000	33500.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	041 41	Lost: 4 cases (9.8%) Partial: 1 cases (2.4%)
2001	012 12	Neutral: 1 cases (8.3%) Won: 2 cases (16.7%)
2002	01211 1211	Dismissed: 1 cases (0.1%) Lost: 2 cases (0.2%) Partial: 1 cases (0.1%) Won: 1 cases (0.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Palakrishnan & Partners in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
YuninshingPlaintiff, Respondent Won (2)	Plaintiff, Respondent	2 cases	Won (2)
Tan Choon KinAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Siddharth MujumdarDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Neo Mei Lan HelenaPetitioner, Respondent Partial (1)	Petitioner, Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)
Kyone Yeom Group Co Pte LtdDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Ramlan bin HaronRespondent Won (1)	Respondent	1 case	Won (1)
The Personal Representatives of the Estate of Tan Kim Hong (Deceased)Defendant Neutral (1)	Defendant	1 case	Neutral (1)
Anand Naidu a/l RamanAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Kandasamy AmbualaganPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Subramaniam s/o KalimuthuPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Julaiha BegumAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Awtar Singh s/o Margar SinghAppellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Lie Djioe Boei alias Lee Yew Wee Executor of the Estate of Lioe Soei Tjin alias Liu Swee Chin (or Lie Soei Tjin also known as Liu Swee Chin), deceasedPlaintiff Partial (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

Case

2002-sghc-209

09 Sep 2002

Tan Choon KinLost

2002-sghc-172

04 Aug 2002

Siddharth MujumdarLost

2002-sghc-162

28 Jul 2002

Neo Mei Lan HelenaPartial

2002-sghc-108

19 May 2002

Kyone Yeom Group Co Pte LtdDismissed

2002-sghc-33

21 Feb 2002

Ramlan bin HaronWon

2001-sghc-278

23 Sep 2001

The Personal Representatives of the Estate of Tan Kim Hong (Deceased)Neutral

2001-sghc-196

22 Jul 2001

YuninshingWon

2001-sghc-194

22 Jul 2001

YuninshingWon

2000-sgca-67

29 Nov 2000

Anand Naidu a/l RamanLost

2000-sghc-223

30 Oct 2000

Kandasamy AmbualaganLost

Subramaniam s/o KalimuthuLost

2000-sgca-42

14 Aug 2000

Julaiha BegumLost

2000-sghc-133

07 Jul 2000

Awtar Singh s/o Margar SinghLost

2000-sghc-107

06 Jun 2000

Lie Djioe Boei alias Lee Yew Wee Executor of the Estate of Lioe Soei Tjin alias Liu Swee Chin (or Lie Soei Tjin also known as Liu Swee Chin), deceasedPartial