M & A Law Corporation

M & A Law Corporation is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2023. The firm has handled 26 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 10 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice. Their track record shows a 26.9% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 26.9% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	7 cases	17.1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76.67% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 17.1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	14.6% of total caseload	Experienced62.14% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14.6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	7.3% of total caseload	Experienced72.00% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	7.3% of total caseload	Experienced71.67% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	7.3% of total caseload	Experienced68.33% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	7.3% of total caseload	General Practice47.14% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7.3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4.9% of total caseload	General Practice42.50% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.9% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	4.9% of total caseload	General Practice46.00% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4.9% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	2.4% of total caseload	Experienced50.00% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.4% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2.4% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	M & A Law Corporation has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2.4% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

M & A Law Corporation has 10 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 8 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Alvin Chang	8 cases	30.8% of firm's cases	2017 sghc 11(Jan 2017) 2013 sghc 241(Nov 2013) 2010 sghc 103(Apr 2010)
Mulani Prakash P	5 cases	19.2% of firm's cases	2023 sghca 6(Feb 2023) 2022 sghc 280(Nov 2022)
Prakash Mulani	5 cases	19.2% of firm's cases	2012 sghc 184(Sep 2012) 2010 sghc 96(Mar 2010) 2008 sghc 223(Nov 2008)
Alvin Chang Jit Hua	4 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2011 sghc 260(Dec 2011) 2009 sghc 120(May 2009) 2008 sghc 223(Nov 2008)
Prakash P Mulani	4 cases	15.4% of firm's cases	2020 sghc 125(Jun 2020) 2015 sghc 145(May 2015)
Tanya Thomas Vadaketh	2 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2018 sghc 69(Mar 2018) 2016 sghc 112(Jun 2016)
Safiuddin bin Mohamed Naseem	2 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2023 sghca 6(Feb 2023) 2022 sghc 280(Nov 2022)
Bhaskaran Sivasamy	2 cases	7.7% of firm's cases	2007 sghc 52(Apr 2007) 2006 sgca 41(Nov 2006)
Chandra Mohan	1 cases	3.8% of firm's cases	2008 sghc 76(Jun 2008)
Hannah Alysha	1 cases	3.8% of firm's cases	2017 sghc 11(Jan 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of M & A Law Corporation's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 7 (26.9%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	133.0 parties avg	3.0	50.0%
Won	73.2 parties avg	3.2	26.9%
Partial	42.9 parties avg	2.9	15.4%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	3.8%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	3.8%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2008	42.8 parties avg	2.8
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	43.7 parties avg	3.7
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	23.4 parties avg	3.4
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of M & A Law Corporation's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	13(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	7(26.9%)	26.9%
Partial	4(15.4%)	15.4%
Neutral	1(3.8%)	3.8%
Withdrawn	1(3.8%)	3.8%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
MYR	8000000	4000000.001 cases	1
SGD	1993129.37	110729.4112 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2007	02 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	022 22	Lost: 2 cases (9.1%) Partial: 2 cases (9.1%)
2009	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	0211 211	Lost: 2 cases (0.9%) Partial: 1 cases (0.5%) Won: 1 cases (0.5%)
2011	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	01 1	Withdrawn: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	01 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2017	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Partial: 1 cases (9.1%)
2023	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by M & A Law Corporation in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Asidokona Mining Resources Pte LtdAppellant, Defendant, Defendant, Defendant, Respondent Won (1)Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant, Defendant, Respondent	3 cases	Won (1)Lost (2)
Soh Sai KiangAppellant, Defendant, Defendant, Defendant, Respondent Won (1)Lost (2)	Appellant, Defendant, Defendant, Defendant, Respondent	3 cases	Won (1)Lost (2)
Ang Meng LeePlaintiff, Appellant, Defendant, Appellant, Plaintiff Lost (3)	Plaintiff, Appellant, Defendant, Appellant, Plaintiff	3 cases	Lost (3)
Ung Yoke HongDefendant Lost (2)	Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
WEALTHPLUS PTE LTDRespondent, Defendant, Respondent Won (1)Neutral (1)	Respondent, Defendant, Respondent	2 cases	Won (1)Neutral (1)
Seaspan Agencies Pte LtdRespondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff Partial (1)Won (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff	2 cases	Partial (1)Won (1)
Highness Electrical Engineering Pte LtdPlaintiff Partial (1)Won (1)	Plaintiff	2 cases	Partial (1)Won (1)
Newfirst LimitedDefendant Lost (2)	Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Pendleton Lane PDefendant Lost (2)	Defendant	2 cases	Lost (2)
Prem N ShamdasaniAppellant, Plaintiff Partial (1)	Appellant, Plaintiff	1 case	Partial (1)
TS Ong Construction Pte LtdDefendant, Appellant Won (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Won (1)
Leong EvaPlaintiff Won (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Won (1)
Alphomega Research Group LtdPlaintiff Withdrawn (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Withdrawn (1)
Quah Hun Kok FrancisRespondent Partial (1)	Respondent	1 case	Partial (1)
Giuffrida LuigiPlaintiff Lost (1)	Plaintiff	1 case	Lost (1)
Singapore Flyer Pte LtdApplicant, Defendant Lost (1)	Applicant, Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ng Tuck ChuanDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Lim Soon Fang BryanDefendant, Appellant Lost (1)	Defendant, Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
PT Asuransi Jasa Indonesia (Persero)Appellant Lost (1)	Appellant	1 case	Lost (1)
Sia Leng Yuen also known as Xie Ning YunApplicant, Respondent Won (1)	Applicant, Respondent	1 case	Won (1)