Foo & Quek LLC

Foo & Quek LLC is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The firm has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 6 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in landlord and tenant law and land law. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 44.4% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	6 cases	26.1% of total caseload	Experienced71.82% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 26.1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	8.7% of total caseload	General Practice23.33% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8.7% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	2 cases	8.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93.00% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8.7% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	8.7% of total caseload	Experienced60.00% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8.7% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	8.7% of total caseload	Experienced63.33% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8.7% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Experienced65.00% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Experienced70.00% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4.3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Foo & Quek LLC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Foo & Quek LLC has 6 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 9 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ng Lip Chih	9 cases	100.0% of firm's cases	2024 sghc 248(Sep 2024) 2024 sghc 9(Jan 2024) 2023 sghc 105(Apr 2023)
Ho Kin Onn	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2024 sghc 248(Sep 2024)
Tan Jinwen Mark (Chen Jinwen)	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2024 sghc 248(Sep 2024)
Chung Jun Hui Joel	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2024 sghc 9(Jan 2024)
Goh Hui Hua	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2020 sgca 103(Oct 2020)
Lai Shueh Chien	1 cases	11.1% of firm's cases	2023 sghc 105(Apr 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Foo & Quek LLC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 4 (44.4%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	63.3 parties avg	3.3	60.0%
Lost	32.8 parties avg	2.8	30.0%
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	10.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	22.8 parties avg	2.8

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Foo & Quek LLC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	6(60.0%)	60.0%
Lost	3(30.0%)	30.0%
Dismissed	1(10.0%)	10.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3481689.81	232112.658 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	02 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2023	011 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (9.1%) Lost: 1 cases (9.1%)
2024	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Foo & Quek LLC in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Angliss Singapore Pte LtdRespondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff Won (2)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff	2 cases	Won (2)
Chan Lap Fung BernardDefendant, Respondent, Defendant Won (2)	Defendant, Respondent, Defendant	2 cases	Won (2)
Menrva Solutions Pte LtdDefendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim, Respondent, Defendant Won (2)	Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim, Respondent, Defendant	2 cases	Won (2)
Hotel Calmo Chinatown Pte LtdDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Tan Tai JoumDefendant Won (1)	Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Chen Jinping MichelleDefendant Dismissed (1)	Defendant	1 case	Dismissed (1)
Chen Jinping Michelle (personal representative of the estate of Tin Koon Ming, deceased)Defendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Goh Seng HengDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Economics at Tuitiongenius Pte LtdRespondent, Defendant Won (1)	Respondent, Defendant	1 case	Won (1)
Toh Yew KeatRespondent, Defendant Won (1)	Respondent, Defendant	1 case	Won (1)