Public Prosecutor v CDL: Sentencing for Sexual Assault of a Minor

In Public Prosecutor v CDL, the High Court of Singapore sentenced CDL to 18 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane for two counts of sexual assault against his stepdaughter, who was a minor at the time of the offenses. The court considered the principles of deterrence and retribution, the aggravating factors of the offenses, and the mitigating factors of the offender, including his guilty plea and voluntary cessation of abuse. The court ordered the sentences to run consecutively.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Accused sentenced to 18 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

CDL was sentenced to 18 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane for sexually assaulting his stepdaughter. The High Court considered deterrence and retribution.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for ProsecutionWon
Lim Jian Yi of Attorney-General’s Chambers
Lim Yu Hui of Attorney-General’s Chambers
CDLDefendantIndividualAccused found guiltyLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Tan Siong ThyeJudge of the High CourtYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Lim Jian YiAttorney-General’s Chambers
Lim Yu HuiAttorney-General’s Chambers
Muntaz Binte ZainuddinI.R.B Law LLP

4. Facts

  1. The accused sexually assaulted his stepdaughter between September 2014 and October 2015.
  2. The victim was between nine and 11 years old at the time of the offences.
  3. The accused penetrated the victim's mouth with his penis on two occasions.
  4. The accused used a blindfold to deceive the victim during the assaults.
  5. The victim disclosed the abuse to her cousins in 2019.
  6. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v CDL, Criminal Case No 29 of 2022, [2022] SGHC 122

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Sexual assaults began
Sexual assaults ended
Victim reported sexual abuse to school counsellor
Matter escalated to the police
Accused arrested
Accused in remand
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Sentencing Principles
    • Outcome: The court applied the principles of deterrence and retribution in sentencing the accused.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Sexual Assault by Penetration
    • Outcome: The court found the accused guilty of sexual assault by penetration under section 376(1)(a) of the Penal Code.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment
  2. Caning

9. Cause of Actions

  • Sexual Assault

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Pram Nair v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2017] 2 SLR 1015SingaporeEstablished the sentencing framework for cases of sexual assault by penetration.
BPH v Public Prosecutor and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2019] 2 SLR 764SingaporeApplied the Pram Nair framework to all forms of non-consensual penetration under s 376 of the Penal Code.
Lim Hock Hin Kelvin v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[1998] 1 SLR(R) 37SingaporeStated that abuse of trust and authority justifies a substantial sentence on the ground of general deterrence.
Public Prosecutor v NFHigh CourtYes[2006] 4 SLR(R) 849SingaporeStated that courts must send an unequivocal message to sex offenders that abusing a relationship or position of authority will be met with the harshest penal consequences.
Public Prosecutor v Kwong Kok HingCourt of AppealYes[2008] 2 SLR(R) 684SingaporeSentences must protect the fabric of society through the defence of communitarian values.
GBR v Public Prosecutor and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2018] 3 SLR 1048SingaporeThe fact that sexual exploitation continued for a sustained period is an aggravating factor.
Public Prosecutor v CCGHigh CourtYes[2021] SGHC 207SingaporeDistinguished from cases where the penetrative act occurred for only a few seconds.
Ng Kean Meng Terence v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2017] 2 SLR 449SingaporeThe presence of TIC charges may result in an uplift in sentence.
Public Prosecutor v UIHigh CourtYes[2008] 4 SLR(R) 500SingaporeThe presence of TIC charges may result in an uplift in sentence.
Mohamed Shouffee bin Adam v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2014] 2 SLR 998SingaporeOutlines the totality principle in sentencing.
BWM v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2021] SGCA 83SingaporeA global sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane was appropriate given the appellant’s abuse of his position of trust and authority, the victim’s young age and the appellant’s premeditation.
Public Prosecutor v BLVHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 154SingaporeThe offender committed a litany of sexual offences against his biological daughter over a period of three years when she was between 11 and 13 years old.
BLV v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2019] 2 SLR 726SingaporeIncreased the sentence for the SAP offence to 12 years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane, giving rise to an aggregate sentence of 28 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 376Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 376(1)(a)Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 376(4)(b)Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 511Singapore
Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) s 354(2)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Sexual assault
  • Penetration
  • Stepdaughter
  • Minor
  • Blindfold
  • Deterrence
  • Retribution
  • Statement of Facts
  • Statement of Facts
  • Statement of Facts

15.2 Keywords

  • Sexual assault
  • Penetration
  • Minor
  • Sentencing
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Sexual Offences
  • Child Abuse