Taishi-Tech v Hyundai: Breach of Oral Contract Dispute over Watertown Project Payments
Taishi-Tech (S) Pte Ltd (“Taishi”) sued Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (“Hyundai”) in the General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore, alleging breach of an oral contract. Taishi claimed Hyundai agreed to pay it directly for work done on the Watertown Project, a residential and commercial development. Hyundai denied the terms of the agreement. Lee Seiu Kin J dismissed Taishi's claim, finding insufficient evidence to prove the existence of the alleged direct deal agreement.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
General Division of the High Court1.2 Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Taishi-Tech sued Hyundai for breach of contract, alleging Hyundai agreed to pay directly for works on the Watertown Project. The court dismissed Taishi-Tech's claim.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Taishi-Tech (S) Pte Ltd | Plaintiff | Corporation | Claim Dismissed | Lost | |
Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd | Defendant | Corporation | Judgment for Defendant | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Lee Seiu Kin | Judge of the High Court | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- Hyundai was the main contractor for the Watertown Project.
- Hyundai subcontracted part of the works to J-Plan Associates Pte Ltd.
- J-Plan sub-subcontracted part of the works to Taishi-Tech.
- Taishi-Tech encountered payment problems with J-Plan.
- Taishi-Tech alleged Hyundai agreed to pay it directly.
- Hyundai admits to an agreement to pay Taishi-Tech directly, but disputes the terms.
- Hyundai made several direct payments to Taishi-Tech.
5. Formal Citations
- Taishi-Tech (S) Pte Ltd v Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd, Suit No 604 of 2018, [2021] SGHC 208
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Hyundai engaged as main contractor for Watertown Project | |
Hyundai engaged J-Plan as subcontractor | |
Hyundai engaged J-Plan as subcontractor for interior design works | |
J-Plan engaged Taishi-Tech as sub-subcontractor | |
J-Plan engaged Taishi-Tech as sub-subcontractor | |
Taishi-Tech ceased work due to payment issues | |
Hyundai issued cheque to Taishi-Tech for SGD 118,784.92 | |
Hyundai issued cheque to Taishi-Tech for SGD 123,352.72 | |
Hyundai made payment of SGD 107,000 to Taishi-Tech | |
Hyundai transferred SGD 321,000 to Taishi-Tech | |
Taishi-Tech completed works for Watertown Project | |
J-Plan was wound up | |
Suit No 604 of 2018 filed | |
Trial began | |
Judgment reserved | |
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Breach of Contract
- Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of the alleged direct deal agreement and dismissed the claim for breach of contract.
- Category: Substantive
- Related Cases:
- [2012] 4 SLR 1206
8. Remedies Sought
- Monetary Damages
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Commercial Litigation
- Construction Disputes
11. Industries
- Construction
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCBC Capital Investment Asia Ltd v Wong Hua Choon | Court of Appeal | Yes | [2012] 4 SLR 1206 | Singapore | Cited for the importance of documentary evidence in determining the existence and terms of a contract. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Watertown Project
- Direct Deal Agreement
- Sub-subcontracts
- Back-to-back payment
- Subcontractors
- Main contractor
15.2 Keywords
- breach of contract
- construction
- payment dispute
- Watertown Project
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Contract Law | 90 |
Contractual terms | 85 |
Breach of Contract | 75 |
16. Subjects
- Contract Dispute
- Construction Dispute