Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme: Issue Estoppel & Summary Judgment in Breach of Contract Dispute

In Merck KGaA and Merck Pte Ltd v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others, the Singapore High Court addressed an application by Merck KGaA for summary judgment against Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp for breach of contract, specifically concerning the 1970 Agreement and 1975 Letter. The court considered whether English decisions gave rise to issue estoppels regarding the interpretation of clause 7 of the 1970 Agreement and the governing law of the contract. The court determined that Merck Sharp & Dohme is bound by the UKCA decision that the governing law of the 1970 Agreement and 1975 Letter is German law and that the use of the word Merck per se constitutes a breach of clause 7. The summary judgement application was dismissed.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

The court determined that Merck Sharp & Dohme is bound by the UKCA decision that the governing law of the 1970 Agreement and 1975 Letter is German law and that the use of the word Merck per se constitutes a breach of clause 7. The summary judgement application was dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore High Court case concerning issue estoppel and summary judgment in a breach of contract dispute between Merck KGaA and Merck Sharp & Dohme.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Merck KGaAPlaintiffCorporationPreliminary issue application granted in partPartial
Merck Pte LtdPlaintiffCorporationNeutralNeutral
Merck Sharp & Dohme CorpDefendantCorporationPreliminary issue application decided againstLost
MSD Pharma (Singapore) Pte LtdDefendantCorporationNeutralNeutral
MSD International GmBh (Singapore Branch)DefendantCorporationNeutralNeutral
Merck & Co., IncDefendantCorporationNeutralNeutral

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Lee Seiu KinJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Merck KGaA and Merck Sharp & Dohme are involved in legal disputes in various jurisdictions.
  2. The disputes concern the use of the word 'Merck' under a 1970 Agreement and a 1975 Letter.
  3. English decisions held that German law governs the 1970 Agreement and 1975 Letter.
  4. An English court held that MSD was in breach of clause 7 of the 1970 Agreement.
  5. Merck sought summary judgment against MSD for breach of contract.
  6. MSD challenged Merck's assertion as the successor company to E.Merck.
  7. The court considered whether English decisions gave rise to issue estoppels.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Merck KGaA and another v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others, Suit No 415 of 2018 (Summons 4434 of 2018), [2019] SGHC 231

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Agreement signed between E.Merck and MSD
Letter agreement between E.Merck and MSD
Merck commenced legal proceedings against MSD in the UK
Close of pleadings
Merck filed for summary judgment against MSD
First hearing
Parties tendered further submissions
Defendants obtained leave to adduce further evidence
Final hearing
Judgment reserved

7. Legal Issues

  1. Issue Estoppel
    • Outcome: The court found that the English decisions gave rise to issue estoppels in relation to the governing law of the 1970 Agreement and 1975 Letter, as well as the interpretation of clause 7 of the 1970 Agreement.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court determined that the use of the word Merck per se constitutes a breach of clause 7.
    • Category: Substantive
  3. Governing Law of Contract
    • Outcome: The court determined that the governing law of the 1970 Agreement and 1975 Letter is German law.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Summary Judgment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Pharmaceutical

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & OthersHigh CourtYes[2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch)England and WalesCited for the holding that the governing law of the 1970 Agreement and the 1975 Letter is German law.
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp and Dohme CorpHigh CourtYes[2016] EWHC 49 (Pat)England and WalesCited for the holding that MSD was in breach of clause 7 of the 1970 Agreement.
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & OrsCourt of AppealYes[2017] EWCA Civ 1834England and WalesCited for upholding the High Court's decision that MSD was in breach of clause 7 of the 1970 Agreement and the interpretation of clause 7.
Thoday v ThodayN/AYes[1964] P 181N/ACited for the explanation of the doctrine of issue estoppel.
Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck and othersN/AYes[2007] 1 SLR(R) 453SingaporeCited for the explanation of the doctrine of issue estoppel.
The Sennar (No 2)House of LordsYes[1985] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 521United KingdomCited for setting out the conditions to raise an estoppel per rem judicatam.
Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v MCST Plan No 301N/AYes[2005] 3 SLR(R) 157SingaporeCited for setting out the conditions to raise an estoppel per rem judicatam.
Humpuss Sea Transport Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and anotherN/AYes[2016] 5 SLR 1322SingaporeCited regarding the recognition of foreign judgments.
Terrestrial Pte Ltd v Allgo Marine Pte Ltd and anotherN/AYes[2014] 1 SLR 985SingaporeCited for the law on summary judgment applications.
Associated Development Pte Ltd v Loong Sie Kiong GeraldN/AYes[2009] 4 SLR (R) 389SingaporeCited for the law on summary judgment applications.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Order 14 r 1 of the Rules of Court
Order 14 r 12 of the Rules of Court

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R5, 2014 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Issue Estoppel
  • Summary Judgment
  • Breach of Contract
  • 1970 Agreement
  • 1975 Letter
  • Governing Law
  • Clause 7
  • Merck
  • MSD
  • E.Merck

15.2 Keywords

  • Issue Estoppel
  • Summary Judgment
  • Breach of Contract
  • Merck
  • Pharmaceutical
  • Singapore High Court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Contract Law
  • Intellectual Property Law