Inzign Pte Ltd v Associated Spring Asia Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Set-Off, and Costs

Inzign Pte Ltd sued Associated Spring Asia Pte Ltd in the High Court of Singapore for breach of contract. Associated Spring Asia Pte Ltd filed a counterclaim for the price of goods Inzign Pte Ltd failed to take delivery of. The court (Chua Lee Ming J) dismissed Inzign Pte Ltd's claim and entered judgment for Associated Spring Asia Pte Ltd on its counterclaim, allowing a set-off. Both parties have appealed against the decision.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Plaintiff's claim dismissed; judgment for Defendant on counterclaim.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Inzign sued Associated Spring for breach of contract. The court dismissed Inzign's claim and entered judgment for Associated Spring on its counterclaim, allowing a set-off.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Inzign Pte LtdPlaintiff, DefendantCorporationClaim DismissedLost
Associated Spring Asia Pte LtdDefendant, PlaintiffCorporationJudgment for Defendant on CounterclaimWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chua Lee MingJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Plaintiff sued defendant for breach of contract related to the supply of springs.
  2. Defendant counterclaimed for the price of goods plaintiff failed to take delivery of.
  3. The defendant was required to carry out a 100K Cleaning Process for the springs.
  4. Defendant did not send some springs to Alantac for the 100K Cleaning Process.
  5. Plaintiff discovered stained springs in December 2012.
  6. Plaintiff missed a shipment to IVAX in December 2012 due to internal investigations.
  7. Plaintiff refused to take delivery of outstanding orders.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Inzign Pte Ltd v Associated Spring Asia Pte Ltd, Suit No 1240 of 2014, [2018] SGHC 147

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Plaintiff approached by IVAX Pharmaceuticals UK Limited through the Economic Development Board.
Supply Agreement signed between plaintiff and defendant.
Plaintiff discovered some of the compression springs supplied by the defendant were stained.
Plaintiff learnt from Alantac that it had not received Springs for washing from the defendant for certain periods of time.
Plaintiff conducted an audit of the defendant’s premises and confirmed that the defendant had not been complying with the 100K Cleaning Process.
Plaintiff asked for the COC confirming compliance with the 100K Cleaning Process to be issued by Alantac.
Suit filed (Suit No 1240 of 2014).
Defendant made offers to settle.
Trial began.
Judgment given for the plaintiff in the sum of $52,111.37, and judgment to the defendant on its counterclaim in the sum of $78,087.60.
Court decided in favour of the defendant on its defence of set-off.
Grounds of decision issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court found that the defendant breached its contractual obligation to carry out the 100K Cleaning Process.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Failure to comply with quality specifications
      • Failure to perform 100K Cleaning Process
  2. Defence of Set-Off
    • Outcome: The court allowed the defendant's defence of set-off, extinguishing the plaintiff's claim.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Legal set-off
      • Equitable set-off
      • Set-off by judgment
  3. Costs
    • Outcome: The court ordered the plaintiff to pay costs on the claim and counterclaim on the standard basis up to the date of service of the offers and on the indemnity basis thereafter.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Offer to settle
      • Indemnity costs
      • Standard costs
  4. Unfair Contract Terms Act
    • Outcome: The court found that the three-month limitation period in the Quotation Terms was unreasonable and could not be relied upon by the defendant.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Reasonableness of limitation period

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Pharmaceutical
  • Healthcare

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Pacific Rim Investments Pte Ltd v Lam Seng Tiong & anotherHigh CourtYes[1995] 2 SLR(R) 643SingaporeCited for the principle of equitable set-off, specifically that a cross-claim must arise from the same transaction or be closely connected such that it would be manifestly unjust to allow enforcement without considering the cross-claim.
Longyuan-Arrk (Macao) Pte Ltd v Show and Tell Productions Pte Ltd and another suitHigh CourtYes[2013] SGHC 160SingaporeCited for the principle of set-off by judgment, which arises under the Court’s inherent jurisdiction to set-off cross-liabilities established by judgments.
Hanak v GreenN/AYes[1958] 2 WLR 755N/ACited for the principle that a defendant who successfully defends a claim and obtains judgment on a counterclaim is entitled to costs on both the defense and the counterclaim.
Yong Mok Hin v United Malay States Sugar Industries LtdN/AYes[1966] MLJ 286N/ACited for the principle that a defendant who successfully defends a claim and obtains judgment on a counterclaim is entitled to costs on both the defense and the counterclaim.
Ram Das V N v SIA Engineering Co LtdN/AYes[2015] 3 SLR 267SingaporeCited for the principle that an offer to settle must be a serious and genuine offer and should contain reasonable terms.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed)

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Unfair Contract Terms Act (Cap 396, 1994 Rev Ed)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • 100K Cleaning Process
  • Springs
  • Certificate of Compliance
  • Outstanding Orders
  • Vendor Delivery Schedule
  • Quotation Terms
  • Set-off
  • Indemnity costs
  • Standard costs

15.2 Keywords

  • contract
  • breach of contract
  • set-off
  • costs
  • cleaning process
  • springs
  • singapore
  • high court

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Contract Law
  • Civil Procedure
  • Commercial Litigation