Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard v Robinson & Co: Constructive Dismissal & Damages

Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard ('P') sued Robinson & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd ('Employer') in the High Court of Singapore, Woo Bih Li J, on 26 December 2013, claiming constructive dismissal and damages. P alleged he was constructively dismissed due to persecution for being homosexual. The Employer successfully applied to strike out P's claim, arguing that even if constructive dismissal occurred, P's damages were limited to the two months' salary in lieu of notice stipulated in his employment contract, which he had already received more than. The court dismissed P's appeal.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Employee claimed constructive dismissal due to alleged persecution for homosexuality. Court struck out claim, finding damages limited to contract terms.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Wee Kim San Lawrence BernardPlaintiff, AppellantIndividualClaim DismissedLost
Robinson & Co (Singapore) Pte LtdDefendant, RespondentCorporationJudgment for DefendantWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Woo Bih LiJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff was an employee of the defendant, a department store.
  2. The plaintiff tendered his resignation on 24 August 2012.
  3. The plaintiff claimed constructive dismissal, alleging persecution for being homosexual.
  4. The defendant paid the plaintiff four months' salary in lieu of notice, exceeding the two months stipulated in the employment contract.
  5. The defendant applied to strike out the plaintiff's claim, arguing damages were limited to the contractual notice period.
  6. The plaintiff's employment contract stipulated two months' salary in lieu of notice for termination.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Wee Kim San Lawrence Bernard v Robinson & Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Suit No 1036 of 2012, [2013] SGHC 279

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Letter of Appointment signed
Resignation tendered
Action filed
Summons filed for discovery of documents
Summons filed to strike out claim
Order issued for discovery of redacted documents
Affidavit filed in response
Summons filed to expunge paragraphs of affidavit
Summonses heard by Assistant Registrar
Registrar's Appeals filed
Appeals heard and dismissed
Notice of appeal to Court of Appeal filed
Judgment issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Constructive Dismissal
    • Outcome: The court found that even if constructive dismissal occurred, the plaintiff's damages were limited to the terms of his employment contract.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1992] 3 SLR(R) 933
      • [1997] 3 WLR 95
  2. Damages for Wrongful Dismissal
    • Outcome: The court held that damages were limited to the salary in lieu of notice as per the employment contract.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1992] 3 SLR(R) 933
      • [2005] 3 SLR(R) 22
  3. Breach of Implied Term of Trust and Confidence
    • Outcome: The court found that the plaintiff's claim for breach of the implied term of trust and confidence was not sufficiently particularized.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1997] 3 WLR 95
      • [2013] 2 SLR 577

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Constructive Dismissal
  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Employment Litigation

11. Industries

  • Retail

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Alexander Proudfoot Productivity Services Co S’pore Pte Ltd v Sim Hua Ngee Alvin and another appealCourt of AppealYes[1992] 3 SLR(R) 933SingaporeCited for the principle that damages for wrongful dismissal are limited to the amount the employee would have earned until the employer could lawfully terminate the contract.
Teh Guek Ngor Engelin nee Tan and others v Chia Ee Lin Evelyn and anotherCourt of AppealYes[2005] 3 SLR(R) 22SingaporeCited to reiterate the measure of damages for wrongful dismissal as stated in Alexander Proudfoot.
Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA (in compulsory liquidation)House of LordsYes[1997] 3 WLR 95England and WalesCited by the plaintiff to claim damages beyond the contractual stipulation, but the court found it inapplicable as the plaintiff's statement of claim lacked particulars relevant to establishing a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
Cheah Peng Hock v Luzhou Bio-Chem Technology LtdN/AYes[2013] 2 SLR 577SingaporeCited regarding the requirement to show a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Constructive Dismissal
  • Salary in Lieu of Notice
  • Implied Term of Trust and Confidence
  • Striking Out
  • Employment Contract

15.2 Keywords

  • constructive dismissal
  • employment law
  • singapore
  • high court
  • damages
  • contract
  • sexual orientation
  • discrimination

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Employment Law
  • Contract Law
  • Civil Procedure