Fong Khim Ling v Tan Teck Ann: Loss of Dependency Claim for Deceased Son

Fong Khim Ling, as administrator of the estate of Fong Ching Pau Lloyd, appealed to the High Court of Singapore against the District Court's decision regarding damages awarded for loss of dependency after Fong Ching Pau Lloyd's death in a traffic accident involving Tan Teck Ann. The High Court, presided over by Judith Prakash J, dismissed the appeal, upholding the District Judge's assessment with minor adjustments to the multiplicand calculation. The claim was for loss of dependency and special damages.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal regarding damages for loss of dependency after a fatal traffic accident. The court upheld the lower court's decision, adjusting the multiplicand calculation.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Fong Khim Ling (administrator of the estate of Fong Ching Pau Lloyd, deceased)AppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
Tan Teck AnnRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Judith PrakashJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Fong Khim Ling is the administrator of the estate of Fong Ching Pau Lloyd, who died in a traffic accident.
  2. The accident involved the deceased's motorcycle and a bus driven by Tan Teck Ann.
  3. Liability was agreed in the ratio 95:5 in favor of the appellant.
  4. The deceased was 21 years old and had been admitted to Singapore Management University to read business management.
  5. The deceased's parents claimed damages for loss of dependency.
  6. The deceased's father earned $400 a month, and the mother earned $1,000 a month as a clerk.
  7. The deceased had two siblings who were expected to contribute to their parents' support.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Fong Khim Ling (administrator of the estate of Fong Ching Pau Lloyd, deceased) v Tan Teck Ann, District Court Suit No 1545 of 2010 (Registrar's Appeal Subordinate Courts No 185 of 2012), [2013] SGHC 104
  2. Fong Khim Ling, the Administrator of the Estate of Fong Ching Pau, Lloyd (Feng Qingbao), deceased v Tan Teck Ann, , [2012] SGDC 429

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Fong Ching Pau Lloyd died in a traffic accident
District Court Suit No 1545 of 2010 filed
Interlocutory judgment for damages to be assessed obtained by consent
Parties signed a memorandum pursuant to s 23 of the Subordinate Courts Act
Assessment of damages hearing took place
Assessment of damages hearing took place
Deputy Registrar awarded damages to the Appellant
District Judge allowed the respondent’s appeal
Appellant appealed to the High Court
Appeal heard by the High Court
Appeal dismissed by the High Court
Grounds for decision issued

7. Legal Issues

  1. Assessment of Damages for Loss of Dependency
    • Outcome: The court upheld the District Judge's assessment with minor adjustments to the multiplicand calculation, dismissing the appeal.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Calculation of Multiplicand
      • Determination of Multiplier
      • Apportionment of Earnings
    • Related Cases:
      • [1990] 1 SLR(R) 235
      • [2008] 1 SLR(R) 409
      • [1999] 1 SLR(R) 154
      • [2008] 3 SLR(R) 735
      • [1999] 1 SLR(R) 1068
      • [1998] SGHC 376
      • [2004] 1 SLR(R) 513
      • [2009] SGDC 133
  2. Costs of Assessment Hearing
    • Outcome: The court dismissed the appeal on the costs order.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Damages for Loss of Dependency
  2. Special Damages (Bereavement, Funeral Expenses)

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Law
  • Civil Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Ng Siew Choo v Tan Kian ChoonUnknownYes[1990] 1 SLR(R) 235SingaporeCited for the principle that parents may claim damages for loss of dependency even where there was rarely any actual dependency, so long as there was some basis of fact from which the inference could be drawn that there was a reasonable expectation of pecuniary benefits to the parent, and therefore of prospective loss from the death.
Hanson Ingrid Christina v Tan Puey TzeUnknownYes[2008] 1 SLR(R) 409SingaporeCited for the principle that the final aim of any court in calculating loss of dependency is to make a direct assessment of the value of the reasonable expectation of pecuniary benefit.
Gul Chandiram Mahtani v Chain SinghUnknownYes[1999] 1 SLR(R) 154SingaporeCited in support of the principle that the final aim of any court in calculating loss of dependency is to make a direct assessment of the value of the reasonable expectation of pecuniary benefit.
Man Mohan Singh v Zurich Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd (now known as QBE Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd) and another and another appealCourt of AppealYes[2008] 3 SLR(R) 735SingaporeCited for the principle that assessment of loss of dependency entails a measure of estimation and the court should not have unthinking regard to benchmarks or guidelines established by precedents.
Ho Yeow Kim v Lai Hai KuenUnknownYes[1999] 1 SLR(R) 1068SingaporeCited as a comparison case where the deceased was a student and the court assessed prospective earnings based on likely graduation and employment.
Tan Ngo Hwa v Siew Mun PhuiHigh CourtYes[1998] SGHC 376SingaporeCited as a comparison case where the court assessed prospective earnings based on likely education level and employment, even without concrete evidence of a specific career path.
Tan Harry v Teo Chee Yeow AloysiusUnknownYes[2004] 1 SLR(R) 513SingaporeCited regarding the apportionment of a percentage of salary to parents.
Li Zhongyuan v Novena Hall Pte LtdDistrict CourtYes[2009] SGDC 133SingaporeCited regarding the apportionment of a percentage of salary to parents.
Ng Siew Choo v Tan Kian ChoonUnknownYes[1990] 1 SLR(R) 235SingaporeCited regarding the likelihood of marriage and its effect on contributions to family.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Subordinate Courts Act (Cap 321, 2007 Rev Ed), s 23Singapore
Maintenance of Parents Act (Cap 167B, 1996 Rev Ed), s 5Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Loss of Dependency
  • Multiplicand
  • Multiplier
  • Prospective Earnings
  • Apportionment of Earnings
  • Accelerated Payment
  • Graduate Employment Survey
  • Ministry of Manpower Report on Wages

15.2 Keywords

  • traffic accident
  • loss of dependency
  • damages assessment
  • Singapore
  • High Court
  • civil appeal

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Civil Procedure
  • Damages
  • Personal Injury
  • Loss of Dependency